Risk Authentication Using Cell Tower Corroboration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional risk-based authentication systems fail to accurately reflect transaction risk due to the potential for false location data from infected GPS units, leading to incorrect risk scoring and potential fraudulent activities.

Innovation Solution

The improved technique corroborates previous transaction data using independent information sources, such as cell towers, to verify the accuracy of location data, assigning a higher risk score if the data does not match, thus enhancing the authenticity process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If location data from GPS unit is used for authentication, then authentication speed is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to potential false data from infected GPS units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication speedVSAvoidlocation data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces cell tower location data as an intermediary verification source. Instead of directly trusting GPS unit data, the system uses cell tower information as a mediator to corroborate or refute the GPS-provided location, thereby resolving the contradiction between fast authentication and accurate location verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing GPS location data against cell tower location data. When the two sources disagree, the system receives feedback indicating potential GPS compromise and adjusts authentication accordingly, maintaining both speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple independent information sources are used to corroborate transaction data, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively using corroboration based on risk assessment. Not all transactions require full corroboration - the system performs partial verification when risk is low and more extensive verification when risk is high, improving reliability without always incurring maximum complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system is segmented into modular components: GPS data collection, cell tower data collection, corroboration logic, and risk assessment. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by enabling/disabling specific modules based on transaction risk levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9230066B1Assessing risk for third-party data collectors
Publication Date: 2016.01.05 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US9230066B1 patent drawing
  • US9230066B1 patent drawing
  • US9230066B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved technique authenticates a user based on an ability to corroborate previous transaction data sent by a user device. Along these lines, the improved technique makes use of an independent information source for verifying the accuracy of previous transaction data obtained by a given collector. For example, when a collector of location data is a GPS unit of a cell phone, an independent information source may be a cell tower closest to the cell phone at the time of the transaction. While location data provided by the cell tower may not be as precise as that provided by the GPS unit, such data is useful for corroborating the location data from the GPS unit. In this scenario, if the data provided by the cell tower fails to corroborate that provided by the GPS unit, then the GPS unit adds significant risk to authenticating the user.