Risk-Contour RL Control for Safe Distributed Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) techniques face challenges in distributed systems, particularly in balancing exploration and safety, as current safety shields either restrict exploration excessively or fail to scale effectively, leading to potential performance degradation and safety breaches.

Innovation Solution

Introduce the concept of risk contours that encapsulate probabilities and domain-level consequences of future states, enabling distributed nodes to balance exploration and safety by incorporating confidence scores and hazard assessments in action selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard RL exploration is performed in the real environment, then the agent can learn from actual rewards and transitions, but performance degradation and safety breaches occur due to suboptimal actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety complianceVSAvoidperformance degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces risk contours as an intermediary layer between the RL agent and the real environment. These contours act as a mediator that filters and guides exploration actions, allowing the agent to learn from real environment feedback while preventing harmful suboptimal actions. The risk contours serve as a safety mechanism that doesn't completely block exploration but rather channels it through a risk-aware framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary risk assessment by calculating risk contours before executing actions in the real environment. By evaluating potential risks in advance and only permitting actions that fall within acceptable risk boundaries, the system prevents performance degradation and safety breaches before they occur, rather than reacting to them after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If safety shields are used to block unsafe actions, then safety is improved, but exploration is excessively restricted leading to limited learning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidexploration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic risk contours that adapt and evolve as the RL agent gains experience. Unlike static safety shields that permanently block certain actions, the risk contours are dynamically adjusted based on the agent's learned knowledge, allowing exploration capabilities to expand over time while maintaining safety assurances. This dynamic nature enables the system to become progressively more adaptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of risk tolerance by adjusting the risk contours based on the agent's experience and confidence levels. As the agent learns more about the environment, the risk contours expand to allow greater exploration in previously unsafe regions, transforming the safety mechanism from a restrictive barrier to an enabling framework that grows with the agent's capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If simulators are used for training, then unconstrained exploration is possible, but modelling errors reduce reliability for real-world deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploration freedomVSAvoidsimulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges simulator-based training with real environment interaction by using risk contours that are informed by both simulated and actual experience. The risk contours integrate knowledge from the simulator while being continuously refined through real environment feedback, creating a hybrid approach that captures the exploration freedom of simulation while grounding reliability in real-world performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the RL agent's real environment experiences are used to continuously update and refine the risk contours. This feedback loop allows the system to correct simulation errors over time by learning from actual environment responses, progressively improving the accuracy and reliability of the risk assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12531781B2Methods and apparatus for managing an environment within a domain
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12531781B2 patent drawing
  • US12531781B2 patent drawing
  • US12531781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer implemented methods are disclosed for managing, and for facilitating management of an environment within a domain, the environment being operable to perform a task. The management method includes for each of a plurality of possible actions that may be executed on the environment in a current state of the environment, obtaining a risk contour and predicted reward associated with the possible action. The method further includes selecting, from among the possible actions and on the basis of the risk contours and predicted reward, an action for execution on the environment, and initiating execution of the selected action. A risk contour associated with a possible action includes probabilities of the environment entering possible future states on execution of the action, confidence values associated with the probabilities, and for the possible future states, a representation of a domain level consequence of the environment entering the possible future state.