Risk Feature Extraction for Interpretable Transaction Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Neural networks used in risk prediction models lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand and effectively manage risk transactions.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for extracting risk feature descriptions by inputting risk and random transaction data into a pre-trained neural network model to determine risk feature descriptions based on the importance of transaction representations, using linear models and partial derivatives to classify and interpret risk transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a neural network-based risk prediction model is used, then risk prediction accuracy is improved, but model interpretability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts feature importance information from the neural network model by analyzing the weights and activations of neurons in hidden layers. Specifically, it computes the absolute values of weights connecting neurons to the output layer and aggregates these across multiple neurons to identify which input features contribute most to risk predictions. This extraction process reveals interpretable feature importance rankings while maintaining the model's predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer between the neural network model and the final risk assessment. This intermediary component calculates and reports feature importance metrics that serve as a bridge, translating the black-box neural network outputs into human-readable explanations. The intermediary computes weight-based importance scores and presents them in a structured format that stakeholders can understand and act upon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If feature description extraction is performed to interpret risk predictions, then model interpretability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel interpretabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources only on the specific task of feature importance extraction rather than analyzing every possible aspect of the model. It selectively computes weight-based importance metrics for features that have non-zero weights in the neural network, avoiding unnecessary computations for irrelevant features. This partial approach provides sufficient interpretability without excessive computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from raw neural network activations to transformed feature importance scores. By converting the complex multi-dimensional activation patterns into simplified importance rankings based on weight magnitudes, the system reduces computational complexity while enhancing interpretability. The parameter transformation makes the model behavior more transparent without requiring exhaustive computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250371549A1Risk feature description extraction
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 ALIPAY (HANGZHOU) INFORMATION TECH CO LTD
  • US20250371549A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371549A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371549A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of this specification describe a risk feature description extraction method and apparatus. In the method in the embodiments, risk transaction data for risk transaction prediction are obtained, and random transaction data are randomly obtained from transaction record data. Then, the risk transaction data and the random transaction data are separately input into a risk transaction prediction model, and respective transaction representation is output by a neuron layer that is not an output layer of the risk transaction prediction model. Further, a risk feature description capable of being used to perform risk determining can be determined based on importance of each obtained transaction representation in determining whether a risk transaction has a risk.