Risk Index Calculation for Vehicle Collision Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to effectively identify and quantify high-risk areas for vehicle collisions, leading to unnoticed safety hazards in transportation infrastructure, as environmental factors contributing to risk are often not apparent, observable, or quantifiable, resulting in inadequate resource allocation for safety improvements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system calculates a risk index for various areas by analyzing historical traffic data and observed collisions, generating a risk map that visually depicts risk indices, allowing for comparison and prioritization of high-risk areas for infrastructure improvements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If environmental risk factors are not made apparent and quantifiable, then infrastructure safety assessment remains incomplete, but making them observable requires complex data collection and analysis systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk quantification accuracyVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the risk assessment into multiple independent components: collision data collection, traffic flow analysis, environmental factor evaluation, and risk index calculation. Each component processes specific data types separately before integrating results, making the complex assessment manageable and scalable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The risk assessment system is designed to evaluate multiple types of infrastructure (intersections, bridges, road segments) using a unified risk index methodology. The same system can assess different geographic regions and infrastructure types, making it universally applicable across diverse transportation networks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If comprehensive risk assessment data is collected and analyzed, then high-risk areas can be identified accurately, but the time and computational resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-risk area identification accuracyVSAvoidrisk assessment computation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores baseline metrics such as historical collision rates, traffic flow patterns, and infrastructure characteristics. When assessing a specific area, it retrieves these pre-computed data instead of analyzing raw data from scratch, significantly reducing computation time while maintaining assessment accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex multi-dimensional risk data into a simplified risk index parameter that ranges from 0 to 100. This parameter transformation condenses numerous variables (collision frequency, severity, traffic volume, environmental factors) into a single comparable metric, enabling rapid assessment and comparison across different locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If limited funds are available for infrastructure improvements, then resource allocation becomes constrained, but identifying the most critical areas requires sophisticated risk analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety improvement efficiencyVSAvoidrisk analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different weighting factors to various risk components based on local conditions. For example, bridge infrastructure may weigh structural age and load capacity more heavily, while urban intersections may prioritize pedestrian collision data and traffic signal effectiveness. This localized customization optimizes resource allocation for each specific context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10571283B1System for reducing vehicle collisions based on an automated segmented assessment of a collision risk
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US10571283B1 patent drawing
  • US10571283B1 patent drawing
  • US10571283B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for calculating a risk index for one or more areas (e.g., roads, intersections, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure). For instance, high risk intersections may be identified and mapped from historic auto insurance claim data. High risk intersections may be identified because of an excessive number of vehicle collisions there, and/or an amount and extent of vehicle damage, personal injuries, and/or insurance liability expenses associated with, or resulting from, the vehicle collisions at those locations. Risk indices for various areas may be compared to one another, enabling comparison of the relative riskiness of the areas. In some embodiments, a risk map may be generated to visually depict one or more risk indices for areas within a depicted region. The risk map may be used to quickly identify the riskiest area(s) in the region, and to notify government bodies to facilitate repairs and improve road safety.