Risk-Tiered User Onboarding via Dynamic Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional service provider platforms employ inefficient and one-size-fits-all registration and onboarding processes, leading to a negative user experience and deterring users from utilizing services.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for maintaining a platform database of user preferences for banking services, receiving onboarding requests, determining user levels based on verification results, and transmitting eligible service options, utilizing third-party verification services via APIs for KYC and AML processes to provide a customized and efficient verification process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional one-size-fits-all registration and onboarding processes are used, then security verification is maintained, but user experience deteriorates and users are deterred from using services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity verificationVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the onboarding process into multiple risk-based tiers. Users are classified into different risk categories based on their profile information, and each tier receives a customized verification process appropriate to their risk level. Low-risk users experience streamlined onboarding with minimal verification steps, while high-risk users undergo more rigorous verification, thus maintaining security while improving overall user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the verification process based on real-time assessment of user risk factors. Rather than applying a static one-size-fits-all approach, the verification requirements are dynamically modified according to the user's risk profile, allowing the system to maintain security standards while adapting the user experience to individual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If streamlined onboarding processes are implemented to improve user experience, then user satisfaction increases, but security verification effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidsecurity verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the verification intensity to each user's specific risk profile. Instead of uniformly reducing verification for all users, the system selectively applies streamlined processes only to low-risk users while maintaining rigorous verification for high-risk users. This ensures security effectiveness is preserved for those who need it while improving experience for those who don't require extensive verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes verification parameters dynamically based on risk assessment results. Users with favorable risk profiles have verification parameters relaxed (fewer steps, less documentation), while users with unfavorable profiles have parameters tightened. This parameter adjustment maintains security effectiveness across the board while enabling streamlined processes where appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If customized onboarding processes are implemented based on user preferences, then service differentiation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice differentiationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment and user classification during the initial onboarding stages. By determining the user's risk profile early in the process, the system can pre-determine the appropriate verification tier and service options to present. This preliminary action enables service differentiation without requiring complex real-time decision-making later in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary risk assessment layer that mediates between user input and service delivery. This intermediary component analyzes user information, determines risk levels, and then routes users to appropriate service tiers. This mediator simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing the decision-making logic in a single layer rather than requiring complex point-to-point customization throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240296495A1Techniques for onboarding and verification of users to a services platform
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20240296495A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296495A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296495A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques and apparatus for an interactive element presentation process are described. In one embodiment, for example, an apparatus may include a storage device and logic, at least a portion of the logic implemented in circuitry coupled to the storage device. The logic may operate to maintain a platform database of services selection information based on user selections of a plurality of services, receive an onboarding request from a user device to register a user with a service platform requiring background verification, determine an onboarding request result, and transmit an eligible set of the plurality of service options for presentation on a user device based on a user level of approval and services selection information. Other embodiments are described.