Riveting Machine Fault Diagnosis Using State-Time Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial machines, such as riveting systems, face challenges in diagnosing faults due to complex state machines with numerous states and imperceptible signal changes over time, making it difficult for operators to determine the current state and identify faults.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a state machine to model industrial machine operations, allowing for the identification of current and previous states, determination of fault indicators based on state times, and generation of diagnostic information for user interfaces, including a circular buffer for storing state histories and I/O signal changes to aid in fault diagnosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a state machine models the functions of the industrial machine, then the machine's operating states can be tracked, but the complexity of diagnosing faults increases due to the large number of possible states and signal changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoiddiagnostic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex diagnostic problem by dividing it into manageable components: identifying the current state, identifying previous states, determining state times, and comparing against expected values. This segmentation allows operators to systematically diagnose faults without being overwhelmed by the overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining a history of states and state times, and by pre-establishing expected time periods for state transitions. When a fault occurs, this pre-collected information is immediately available for comparison, enabling rapid diagnosis without requiring complex real-time analysis of the entire state machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the machine monitors all states and signals, then fault detection accuracy improves, but the information processing load increases making it difficult for operators to identify the specific fault state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidoperator cognitive load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the critical information needed for diagnosis: the current state, relevant previous states, and their corresponding state times. By taking out only this essential data from the complete state machine information, the system provides accurate fault diagnosis without overwhelming operators with unnecessary details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by providing detailed diagnostic information specifically at the point of fault occurrence. Instead of presenting all state machine data uniformly, it focuses information locally on the relevant states and time periods surrounding the fault, making it easier for operators to identify the specific problem area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the system tracks incremental signal changes over time, then fault conditions can be detected, but the timing and presence of signals may change imperceptibly making it difficult to determine when a fault occurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault condition detectionVSAvoidfault identification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously tracking and storing state times as the machine operates. This ongoing record-keeping means that when a fault condition is detected through signal monitoring, the timing information is already available, eliminating the need for complex retrospective analysis and enabling immediate fault identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the user interface refreshes frequently to show real-time diagnostic information, then operators can monitor machine states more closely, but the interface performance and responsiveness may degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time monitoring capabilityVSAvoidinterface refresh speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface extracts and displays only the essential diagnostic information: current state, previous states, and state times. By taking out only this critical data for display rather than refreshing the entire interface, the system provides real-time monitoring capability while maintaining interface performance and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3876049B1Diagnosing faults in a riveting machine
Publication Date: 2023.08.30 ATLAS COPCO IAS UK LIMITED
  • EP3876049B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3876049B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3876049B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for diagnosing faults in an industrial machine. The method comprises identifying a first state associated with the industrial machine, identifying at least one second state associated with the industrial machine based on the first state, for each identified second state, determining a state time associated with the second state, determining a fault indicator condition responsive to determining, based on the at least one second state and the respective state times, that the industrial machine spent a time period different to a predetermined time period in at least one of the at least one second states, generating, responsive to determining the fault indication, diagnostic information comprising an indication of the one of the at least one second state, and outputting the diagnostic information in a user interface of the industrial machine.