Information processing apparatus, information processing method, method for evaluating machine learning model, learning method of machine learning model, and storage medium

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning algorithms struggle with robustness when the actual environment deviates from the assumed environment, leading to a trade-off between ensuring robustness and performance, and existing methods for adding noise do not effectively address this issue.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that calculates an adversarial distribution of an environment using a divergence constraint to minimize the action value of a model, ensuring robustness by adding noise that follows a predetermined prior distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noise is added to change state for robustness evaluation, then robustness is improved, but performance during normal operation degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of noise distribution from uniform random noise to adversarial distribution that minimizes action value while constrained by prior distribution. This parameter change allows the system to evaluate robustness under worst-case scenarios without completely sacrificing normal operation performance, as the adversarial distribution is constrained to remain close to the prior distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by adding noise only during evaluation phases rather than continuously during operation. The noise addition is selectively applied when robustness evaluation is needed, allowing the model to maintain high performance during normal operation while still achieving robustness evaluation under perturbed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If excessive robustness is prepared for rare noise events, then robustness is improved, but performance degrades in vain

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of rare noise events into a beneficial evaluation mechanism. By using adversarial distribution that minimizes action value, the system identifies the worst-case scenarios and uses them for targeted robustness evaluation, rather than preparing for all possible rare events indiscriminately. This allows the system to focus computational resources on the most critical robustness challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the divergence constraint that continuously monitors the distance between the adversarial distribution and the prior distribution. This feedback mechanism ensures that the adversarial distribution remains within acceptable bounds, preventing over-preparation for rare events that would unnecessarily degrade performance. The divergence constraint provides real-time guidance to balance robustness evaluation with performance maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If random noise is added to evaluate robustness, then evaluation coverage is improved, but evaluation precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation coverageVSAvoidevaluation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by instead of randomly sampling from the prior distribution, it constructs the adversarial distribution that specifically minimizes the action value function. This inversion allows the system to focus evaluation precision on the most critical failure modes rather than uniformly covering all possible scenarios, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining evaluation coverage through the divergence constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260057297A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, method for evaluating machine learning model, learning method of machine learning model, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260057297A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057297A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057297A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus acquires a predetermined prior distribution of an environmental parameter, calculates an action value of an action in each of environments perturbed by the environmental parameter; and determines an adversarial distribution of an environment for a model to be processed based on the action value. The apparatus determines the adversarial distribution of the environment that reduces the action value of the model to be processed while adding a constraint using a divergence indicating closeness between the adversarial distribution of the environment and the predetermined prior distribution.