Reinforcement Learning CFD Automation for Blade Flow Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of flow around blades in fluid machinery makes it difficult to determine ideal analysis settings for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, leading to time-consuming and costly iterative processes with variable results dependent on engineer judgment.

Innovation Solution

A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) automation method using reinforcement learning to generate an analysis automation model that predicts CFD flow analysis results, optimizing and automating the process by determining analysis setting parameters such as computational mesh generation, turbulence model selection, and numerical method choice.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If iterative simulations are used to find appropriate CFD settings, then analysis accuracy can be improved, but time consumption and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by training a reinforcement learning model in advance to learn optimal CFD settings from historical simulation data. Once trained, the model can directly predict appropriate settings for new blade geometries without requiring iterative simulations, thus achieving high accuracy while eliminating time-consuming trial-and-error processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by enabling the CFD analysis process to automatically determine optimal settings through the reinforcement learning model without human intervention. The model autonomously selects mesh generation parameters, turbulence models, and numerical schemes based on input blade geometry, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating repetitive manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If iterative simulations are performed to adapt settings to different flow conditions, then analysis reliability can be improved, but the process becomes more complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis reliabilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using the reinforcement learning model to automatically adjust CFD simulation parameters (mesh density, turbulence model selection, numerical schemes) based on input blade geometry and flow conditions. The model learns optimal parameter configurations from training data and adapts them to different cases, ensuring reliable results while simplifying the process compared to manual iterative adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms through the reinforcement learning training process, where simulation results are fed back to update and improve the model's predictions. The model learns from historical simulation data and evaluation metrics, continuously refining its ability to predict optimal settings, thereby improving reliability while maintaining process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If professional settings are manually configured for CFD analysis, then analysis accuracy can be maintained, but the process requires significant expertise and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by enabling automatic configuration of CFD settings through the reinforcement learning model. The model independently determines optimal mesh generation parameters, turbulence models, and numerical schemes based on input geometry, eliminating the need for manual expert configuration while maintaining high analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing the manual expert judgment and mechanical configuration process with an automated reinforcement learning-based prediction system. The ML model substitutes human expertise in setting CFD parameters, transforming a skill-dependent manual process into an automated intelligent system that maintains accuracy while dramatically improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If settings are optimized for specific conditions, then analysis accuracy improves, but the settings become less effective when flow conditions or geometry change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by training the reinforcement learning model on diverse training data encompassing various blade geometries and flow conditions. The model learns generalizable patterns that allow it to predict optimal CFD settings for a wide range of applications, making the system universally applicable rather than condition-specific. This enables the same model to accurately configure simulations for different geometries and flow regimes without requiring condition-specific tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250156610A1CFD automation method for optimal flow analysis over blades using reinforcement learning, CFD flow analysis method for blades, and CFD flow analysis device for blades
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 POSTECH ACADEMY INDUSTRY FOUNDATION
  • US20250156610A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156610A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156610A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow analysis method for blades includes: generating an analysis automation model that predicts CFD flow analysis results according to input analysis conditions, the generating an analysis automation model comprising inputting a blade shape and flow conditions, determining analysis settings for flow analysis over blades, performing CFD simulation based on the determined analysis setting parameters to conduct flow analysis over blades, evaluating results of the performed flow analysis over blades, and training through reinforcement learning using artificial neural networks to satisfy predetermined evaluation criteria, inputting arbitrary blade shape conditions and flow conditions, and determining analysis setting parameters by applying the analysis automation model to the input blade shape and flow conditions, predicting CFD simulation, and outputting the predicted CFD simulation as flow analysis results.