RL-Aided Channel Tracking for Variable-Dynamic Communication Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional channel-tracking algorithms often lead to suboptimal performance in communication systems with dynamic and complex channel conditions, particularly in aerial copper cables and wireless channels, where mathematical models are difficult to describe tractably.

Innovation Solution

A digital circuit employing an adaptive finite-impulse-response filter updated using reinforcement learning, with an electronic controller adjusting the convergence coefficient of the least-mean-squares algorithm based on residual errors and channel estimates, potentially incorporating an artificial neural network for improved performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional channel-tracking algorithms are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the performance is suboptimal in dynamic and complex channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel-tracking performanceVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the convergence coefficient μ variable rather than fixed. The algorithm dynamically adjusts μ based on the observed channel conditions, transitioning between different adaptation rates to match the channel's dynamicity. This resolves the contradiction by enabling the system to adapt its complexity to the actual channel conditions, achieving high performance in dynamic channels without always requiring maximum algorithmic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The channel-tracking algorithm performs self-service by automatically adjusting its own convergence coefficient based on residual errors and channel estimates. The system monitors its own performance metrics and autonomously modifies its parameters to optimize tracking accuracy, eliminating the need for external manual tuning while maintaining high performance in varying channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed convergence coefficient is used in the LMS algorithm, then the algorithm is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to variable dynamicity patterns in the channel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to channel dynamicityVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using residual errors and channel estimates from the adaptive filter to continuously monitor channel conditions. This feedback loop provides information about the channel's dynamicity, which the electronic controller uses to adjust the convergence coefficient accordingly. The feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to variable dynamicity patterns while keeping the controller relatively simple by using straightforward error-based adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter μ (convergence coefficient) based on observed channel conditions and residual errors. By modifying this key parameter dynamically, the algorithm can adapt to different channel dynamicity patterns without requiring a completely different algorithm structure, thus achieving high adaptability with minimal increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the convergence coefficient is increased to speed up convergence, then the tracking speed improves, but the steady-state error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence speedVSAvoidsteady-state error
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by alternating between different convergence coefficient values based on the channel's dynamicity. During periods of high channel variation, a larger μ is used to speed up tracking. During stable periods, a smaller μ is applied to reduce steady-state error. This periodic adjustment of the convergence parameter allows the system to optimize both convergence speed and precision at different times, resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11128498B2Communication-channel tracking aided by reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US11128498B2 patent drawing
  • US11128498B2 patent drawing
  • US11128498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A digital circuit for implementing a channel-tracking functionality, in which an adaptive (e.g., FIR) filter is updated based on reinforcement learning. In an example embodiment, the adaptive filter may be updated using an LMS-type algorithm. The digital circuit may also include an electronic controller configured to change the convergence coefficient of the LMS algorithm using a selection policy learned by applying a reinforcement-learning technique and based on residual errors and channel estimates received over a sequence of iterations. In some embodiments, the electronic controller may include an artificial neural network. An example embodiment of the digital circuit is advantageously capable of providing improved performance after the learning phase, e.g., for communication channels exhibiting variable dynamicity patterns, such as those associated with aerial copper cables or some wireless channels.