Unsupervised RL Goal Detection via Discriminative Feature Partitioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning systems face challenges in effectively partitioning complex tasks into subtasks and generating suitable reward functions for training agents, especially when only a small number of demonstration sequences are available, as existing methods require costly labeling and explicit sub-goal specification.

Innovation Solution

A system that processes demonstration sequences to determine discriminative features for subtasks, allowing for unsupervised partitioning and generation of dense, smooth reward functions, which can be used to train reinforcement learning agents efficiently without explicit labeling or sub-goal specification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If explicit sub-goal specification and costly labeling are used, then the accuracy of task partitioning and reward function generation is improved, but the time consumption and resource costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask partitioning accuracyVSAvoidlabeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs unsupervised task partitioning by automatically analyzing demonstration sequences without requiring external labeling. The algorithm self-organizes the partitioning based on intrinsic patterns in the data, eliminating the need for costly manual annotation while maintaining partitioning quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate representations (latent variables and feature extractors) that bridge the gap between raw demonstration sequences and task partitioning. These intermediaries enable the system to derive meaningful structure from unlabeled data without direct human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a small number of demonstration sequences are used, then the data processing time and resource requirements are reduced, but the quality of learned features and reward functions may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidfeature discrimination quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the problem by changing parameters in the feature space through learned representations. By projecting demonstrations into latent spaces and learning discriminative features in this transformed space, the system can extract maximal information from limited data, maintaining feature quality even with few demonstrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the learning process into distinct components: feature extraction, task partitioning, and reward generation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling effective learning from limited demonstrations by focusing computational resources on extracting maximal discriminative information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If unsupervised partitioning is implemented, then the labeling costs and manual intervention are reduced, but the complexity of the algorithm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling costVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual labeling mechanisms with automated algorithmic partitioning. By substituting human expert annotation with machine learning-based unsupervised partitioning, the system eliminates labeling costs while the algorithmic complexity is managed through efficient feature extraction and latent variable modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If dense and smooth reward functions are generated from few demonstrations, then the training performance of the agent is improved, but the requirement for precise feature discrimination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining performanceVSAvoidfeature discrimination precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary feature extraction and task partitioning before reward function generation. By pre-processing the demonstration sequences to extract discriminative features and establish task structure in advance, the system prepares high-quality inputs for reward generation, enabling dense and smooth reward functions that effectively guide agent training

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12106200B2Unsupervised detection of intermediate reinforcement learning goals
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12106200B2 patent drawing
  • US12106200B2 patent drawing
  • US12106200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for detecting intermediate reinforcement learning goals. One of the methods includes obtaining a plurality of demonstration sequences, each of the demonstration sequences being a sequence of images of an environment while a respective instance of a reinforcement learning task is being performed; for each demonstration sequence, processing each image in the demonstration sequence through an image processing neural network to determine feature values for a respective set of features for the image; determining, from the demonstration sequences, a partitioning of the reinforcement learning task into a plurality of subtasks, wherein each image in each demonstration sequence is assigned to a respective subtask of the plurality of subtasks; and determining, from the feature values for the images in the demonstration sequences, a respective set of discriminative features for each of the plurality of subtasks.