Reinforcement Learning Satellite Attitude Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional satellite control methods face challenges such as reliance on classical control processes, limited adaptability, and difficulties in managing complex satellite constellations, which hinder precise control and stability of satellites.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a reinforcement learning-based satellite control system using omega and Euler agents, which employ actor-critic networks to predict and execute actions that stabilize the satellite's orientation and attitude by reducing angular velocities and Euler angles within predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning-based control is implemented, then adaptability and precision of satellite control is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning model is trained beforehand using simulated satellite data to learn optimal control policies. This preliminary training phase allows the model to adapt to various satellite configurations and orbital conditions offline, reducing the need for complex real-time decision-making hardware while maintaining high adaptability during actual satellite operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A reinforcement learning model serves as an intermediary between raw sensor data and control actuator commands. This intermediate layer processes and interprets satellite state information, translating it into optimized control actions, thereby reducing the complexity of direct control system design while improving adaptability to different mission requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning model is executed continuously, then control precision is improved, but computational resources and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes the reinforcement learning model at selective intervals rather than continuously, performing full model execution only when significant state changes are detected. Between these intervals, simplified control policies derived from the model are applied, maintaining control precision while substantially reducing computational resource usage and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning model is pre-trained offline to capture the essential control policies. During satellite operation, the pre-trained model is executed periodically or event-driven, rather than continuously, leveraging the preliminary learning to maintain high control precision with reduced computational burden and energy consumption during actual mission operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If automated control is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning model enables the satellite control system to autonomously make decisions based on real-time sensor inputs without requiring constant human intervention. The model self-adjusts control parameters by learning from simulated experiences, providing automated control that simplifies operation while the underlying complexity is encapsulated within the software model rather than requiring complex hardware systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250183998A1Reinforcement learning based satellite control
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 WILDSTAR LLC
  • US20250183998A1 patent drawing
  • US20250183998A1 patent drawing
  • US20250183998A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed technology is generally directed to a method for controlling a satellite. In one example of the technology, the method may include receiving a set of parameters associated with an orientation of the satellite and executing a reinforcement learning model to control the orientation of the satellite to stabilize the satellite based on each of the set of parameters. The executing of the reinforcement learning model includes predicting a set of actions to be executed by the satellite to control the orientation of the satellite based on each of the set of parameters, executing the set of actions, and predicting an outcome of the executing of the set of actions to generate a set of rewards. The method may further include controlling the orientation of the satellite to stabilize the satellite based on the set of actions and the set of rewards.