RNA Integrity Assessment via qPCR Cτ Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing RNA integrity, such as the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, lack sensitivity and cannot predict the functional performance of RNA samples in gene expression analysis, leading to variability and errors in large-scale gene expression studies.

Innovation Solution

A high-throughput method involving the identification of candidate genes specific to a tissue or blood specimen, determination of expression scores, and generation of Cτ profiles to quantify RNA degradation, with novel class distinction algorithms to measure RNA quality and exclude subpar samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If microcapillary electrophoretic RNA separation (Bioanalyzer) is used to assess RNA integrity, then a gross analytical assessment is provided, but sensitivity and ability to predict functional performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRNA integrity assessment sensitivityVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical microcapillary electrophoresis system (Bioanalyzer) with a biochemical qPCR-based assessment system. Instead of physically separating RNA molecules by size through electrophoresis, the invention uses quantitative PCR to amplify and detect specific RNA regions, providing more sensitive functional integrity assessment through biochemical amplification and detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the assessment parameters from gross structural evaluation (overall RNA size distribution) to functional parameter measurement (amplification efficiency and Cτ values of specific genes). By monitoring how specific RNA regions amplify during qPCR, the system detects subtle degradation patterns that correlate with functional performance in gene expression studies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If broad-spectrum RNA integrity systems are used, then multiple visualization methods are provided, but they cannot adequately predict functional performance for gene expression analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction of functional performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of assessing overall RNA quality uniformly, the invention evaluates specific local regions of RNA molecules by targeting particular genes with known degradation patterns. Different genes serve as local probes for different aspects of RNA integrity, providing localized functional predictions that are more reliable for gene expression analysis than global assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces specific candidate genes as intermediary markers between RNA structural integrity and functional performance. These genes act as mediators whose amplification characteristics reflect the functional state of RNA samples, bridging the gap between physical integrity measurements and actual gene expression analysis outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If RNA samples are subjected to extensive processing and storage, then large-scale gene expression studies are enabled, but RNA degradation occurs leading to variability and technical errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of gene expression studiesVSAvoidRNA sample integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary quality assessment using qPCR on RNA samples before they are used in large-scale gene expression studies. By evaluating amplification efficiency and Cτ values of candidate genes in advance, the system identifies and excludes degraded samples, preventing them from introducing variability and technical errors into subsequent high-throughput analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where qPCR assessment results directly inform the decision to include or exclude samples from gene expression studies. The amplification data provides real-time feedback on RNA integrity, allowing researchers to adjust sample selection and processing protocols to maintain reliability while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a sensitive and standardized method for evaluating RNA integrity, reducing sample replicate variability and technical errors, and ensuring reliable gene expression data by correlating Cτ scores with intact and degraded RNA profiles.

Implementation Method 1

The test sample is subjected to qPCR, and an amplification plot and a Cτ, score generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerase chain reaction (PCR):

Data Source

PatentUS9994893B2Compositions and methods for functional quality control for human blood-based gene expression products
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV

AI summary

Methods for assessing the integrity of an RNA sample from a given tissue or blood type are disclosed.