Recurrent Neural Network Hyperparameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for tuning hyper-parameters in machine learning training processes are resource-intensive and often require significant manual fine-tuning, failing to efficiently determine optimal settings for achieving high-quality performance.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a recurrent neural network to optimize process parameters by receiving input settings and performance measures, processing these inputs to generate updated settings, and selecting optimal parameters through a subsystem that operates asynchronously across multiple computing units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods are used for tuning hyper-parameters, then manual fine-tuning can achieve acceptable performance, but computational resource usage increases significantly and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance qualityVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a recurrent neural network that automatically learns to predict optimal hyper-parameters through self-service mechanisms. The RNN processes sequences of hyper-parameter settings and their corresponding performance measures, automatically adjusting its internal parameters to minimize manual intervention while maximizing performance quality prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where performance measures from training processes are fed back into the recurrent neural network. This feedback mechanism allows the RNN to continuously learn from actual training outcomes and refine its predictions of optimal hyper-parameters, thereby improving performance quality while reducing the need for extensive computational resource usage in manual tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If conventional methods are used for tuning hyper-parameters, then manual fine-tuning can achieve acceptable performance, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training the recurrent neural network on sequences of hyper-parameter settings and performance measures. This preliminary training enables the RNN to quickly predict optimal hyper-parameters for new training scenarios without requiring time-consuming manual fine-tuning, thus maintaining high performance quality while significantly reducing time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The RNN system serves itself by automatically learning from historical performance data and making autonomous predictions about optimal hyper-parameters. This self-service capability eliminates the need for time-consuming manual intervention while maintaining high performance quality predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If a recurrent neural network is used to optimize process parameters, then computational resource usage decreases and speed increases, but the complexity of the optimization system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a recurrent neural network as an intermediary component between hyper-parameter settings and performance evaluation. This RNN intermediary learns to predict performance outcomes and guide the optimization process, thereby increasing productivity by reducing the need for extensive trial-and-error while managing system complexity through its sequential processing architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If manual fine-tuning is performed for hyper-parameters, then performance quality can be improved, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance qualityVSAvoidease of tuning
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the recurrent neural network to automatically predict optimal hyper-parameters without requiring manual fine-tuning operations. The RNN learns from sequences of settings and performance measures, autonomously identifying optimal configurations that maintain high performance quality while dramatically improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240281714A1Black-box optimization using neural networks
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US20240281714A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281714A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for determining an optimized setting for one or more process parameters of a machine learning training process. One of the methods includes processing a current network input using a recurrent neural network in accordance with first values of the network parameters to obtain a current network output, obtaining a measure of the performance of the machine learning training process with an updated setting defined by the current network output, and generating a new network input that comprises (i) the updated setting defined by the current network output and (ii) the measure of the performance of the training process with the updated setting defined by the current network output.