RO Plant Maintenance Scheduling for Energy and Cost Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment processes in water treatment plants consume significant amounts of energy, leading to increased consumer and producer costs, and there is a need to optimize maintenance to reduce energy consumption and extend equipment lifespan.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a high-level energy optimization machine-learned model (HLEOMLM) and a low-level energy optimization machine-learned model (LLEOMLM) to provide maintenance schedules that optimize energy consumption and operating costs by determining optimal times for maintenance processes on RO water treatment equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If reverse osmosis water treatment process is used, then water production efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater production efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by using machine-learned models to optimize maintenance schedules based on actual plant conditions, energy prices, and demand patterns. This allows the RO system to operate at optimal efficiency points rather than fixed schedules, reducing energy consumption while maintaining water production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the water treatment plant to self-optimize its operations through automated machine-learned models that continuously analyze plant data and generate maintenance schedules without constant human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically adjusting maintenance timing to minimize energy consumption while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If maintenance frequency is increased, then equipment reliability is improved, but operating cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidoperating cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, fixed maintenance schedules to dynamic, adaptive maintenance scheduling. The machine-learned models continuously adjust maintenance timing based on real-time plant conditions, equipment wear patterns, and operational demands, allowing maintenance to occur optimally rather than on rigid intervals. This dynamic approach maintains equipment reliability while reducing unnecessary maintenance operations and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by stationary object

If maintenance is delayed, then operating cost is reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating costVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where machine-learned models monitor plant performance data, energy consumption patterns, and maintenance history. This feedback enables the system to predict when maintenance will become energy-intensive and schedule it proactively at optimal moments, balancing the trade-off between delaying maintenance to reduce costs and performing it timely to avoid energy penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12614155B2System for energy management in a water treatment plant
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC
  • US12614155B2 patent drawing
  • US12614155B2 patent drawing
  • US12614155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for energy management in a water treatment comprises at least one processor coupled to at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a high-level energy optimization machine learned model (HLEOMLM) and a low-level energy optimization machine learned model (LLEOMLM), and a clean-in-place (CIP) system. In general, the processor is configured to obtain input data from an input data source, and constraints data from a constraints data source. The processor executes the HLEOMLM and LLEOMLM to process the input and constraints data to provide as output a long-term maintenance schedule that optimizes energy consumption and a current-maintenance schedule that optimizes operating cost for the water treatment plant. The CIP system receives the output from the processor and executes at least one of a CIP maintenance process and MR maintenance process in response to the output.