Pressure-Responsive Shut-Off Valve for RO Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior reverse osmosis (RO) filtering systems are complex and costly due to the need for additional components like solenoid valves and pressure switches, making them large and cumbersome, and they require a complicated arrangement to operate effectively, especially in zero waste systems.

Innovation Solution

A new shut-off valve design using two rolling diaphragms and a piston with a spring coupling to provide opposing force, which selectively opens and closes the fluid pathway based on pressure levels within the system, eliminating the need for solenoid valves and pressure switches by using a magnetic field sensor switch assembly to control the pump.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If solenoid valves and pressure switches are used to control the pump in zero waste RO systems, then the system can operate effectively, but the device complexity increases and the system becomes larger and more cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the shut-off valve function with the pump control mechanism by integrating a piston directly into the valve body. The piston responds to pressure changes within the system to automatically open or close the shut-off valve, eliminating the need for separate solenoid valves and pressure switches. This merging of functions reduces component count and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining effective operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shut-off valve system is designed to automatically respond to pressure changes without external control signals. The piston moves in response to pressure differential across the membrane, automatically opening the valve when pressure drops (indicating tank needs refilling) and closing when pressure is sufficient. This self-service mechanism eliminates complex control circuits and external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If solenoid valves and pressure switches are used in the RO system, then the system can control water flow effectively, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater flow control effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive electronic components (solenoid valves and pressure switches) with a simpler mechanical piston-based shut-off valve. The piston system uses basic mechanical elements that are cheaper to manufacture and assemble, reducing overall system cost while maintaining effective water flow control through pressure-responsive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces electronic control systems with a purely mechanical pressure-responsive piston mechanism. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive electronic components, wiring, and control logic, while achieving the same water flow control function through mechanical means that are simpler and more cost-effective to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a complicated arrangement of components is used to operate the RO system, then the system can function properly, but the ease of assembly and maintenance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionVSAvoidease of assembly and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex control components (solenoid valves, pressure switches, control circuits) from the system, retaining only the essential mechanical shut-off valve with piston. This extraction simplifies assembly and maintenance by reducing the number of components that need to be installed, connected, and potentially repaired, while maintaining proper system function through the simplified pressure-responsive mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the system, reduces costs, and makes it more compact by directly controlling the flow based on pressure changes, enhancing reliability and ease of assembly and maintenance, while maintaining efficient operation in both standard and zero waste RO systems.

Implementation Method 1

selectively opens and closes the fluid pathway based on pressure levels within the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a piston with a spring coupling to provide opposing force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2344792B1Shut off valve for a reverse osmosis water filtration system
Publication Date: 2019.12.04 WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP2344792B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2344792B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2344792B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A shut-off valve for use in a reverse osmosis filtering system including a housing defining an interior in fluid communication with a water inlet, a water outlet, and a permeate inlet, the housing having a fluidic network with a flowpath that connects the water inlet and the water outlet, a diaphragm plate forming a portion of the fluidic network within the interior, a piston within the interior for selectively opening and closing the flowpath, and at least one diaphragm coupling to the piston and the diaphragm plate such that as permeate pressure changes occur at the permeate outlet, the piston rocks between opening and closing the flowpath based on deflection of the at least one diaphragm in response to the permeate pressure changes.