Road Closure Detection Using Probe Data and Dynamic Time Windows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic service providers face challenges in accurately detecting road closures due to incomplete or inaccurate road closure reports, which can lead to poor quality data and user experiences, and there is a need for a more reliable method to automatically detect road closures.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes probe data from vehicles to automatically detect road closures by constructing a closure link graph, aggregating road links into superlinks, and using a dynamic time window to calculate features for road closure probability, reducing reliance on manual efforts and enhancing coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If road closure reports are collected from manual sources, then coverage of road closures can be obtained, but the data quality is incomplete and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad closure information completenessVSAvoidroad closure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses probe data from vehicles as feedback to verify and correct road closure information. By continuously monitoring vehicle trajectories and detecting anomalies in traffic patterns, the system validates reported road closures and identifies false positives, thereby improving both information completeness and detection accuracy simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic self-detection of road closures through probe data analysis without relying on manual reports. The automated detection mechanism processes vehicle trajectory data to identify closure patterns, reducing dependence on external reporting sources and improving data quality through objective, data-driven detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If automated detection using probe data is implemented, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad closure detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages existing probe data infrastructure that is already collecting vehicle trajectory information for other traffic analysis purposes. By making this existing data serve multiple functions including road closure detection, the system achieves high detection accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a specialized analysis module that acts as an intermediary between raw probe data and road closure detection results. This modular approach processes probe data through specific algorithms to extract closure information, managing complexity by isolating the detection logic from the broader traffic data infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If manual detection methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity and response speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad closure detection speedVSAvoiddetection automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual detection processes with automated computational analysis of probe data. Algorithms automatically process vehicle trajectory information to detect road closures, eliminating the need for human analysts to manually review data, thereby dramatically increasing detection speed and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring of probe data streams to detect road closures in real-time rather than through periodic manual checks. This continuous automated analysis ensures rapid detection and response to new closures, maintaining high productivity without requiring proportional increases in manual labor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3640913B1Method, apparatus, and system for automatic road closure detection
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • EP3640913B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3640913B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3640913B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An approach is provided for automatic road closure detection. The approach, for example, involves designating a dynamic time window comprising one or more time epochs ending before a current time epoch. The approach also involves retrieving a first set of probe data collected from a road link during the dynamic time window. The approach further involves adjusting a size of the dynamic time window by adding or removing another time epoch ending before the current time epoch until at least one criterion related to the probe data, the dynamic time window, or a combination thereof is met. The approach further involves extracting a plurality of features from the first set of probe data, from a second set of probe data collected from the road link during the current time epoch, or a combination thereof. The approach then involves detecting a closure status of the road link based on the plurality of features.