Road Collapse Probability Evaluation Using Soil and Pipeline Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing road collapse assessment methods lack a unified failure probability value analysis that integrates multiple factors, and current detection techniques are scattered and cannot form a systematic road bearing capacity assessment system.

Innovation Solution

A method for evaluating the probability of road collapse by collecting road data, determining road soil layer and underground pipeline deterioration factors, constructing influence intensity models, and summarizing the probabilities of these factors to evaluate the road collapse probability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple detection techniques are used to assess road collapse, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad collapse assessment accuracyVSAvoiddetection equipment arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple detection techniques (ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic exploration, falling weight deflectometer) into a unified detection system that collects data from multiple sources simultaneously. This merging approach improves measurement precision by integrating complementary information while managing device complexity through systematic coordination of the detection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a comprehensive assessment system that serves multiple functions: detecting soil layer conditions, identifying underground pipelines, evaluating pavement structure, and assessing collapse probability. This multi-functional system improves measurement precision across different parameters while reducing the need for separate specialized detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If scattered detection equipment is used for pavement structural deteriorations and intensity, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection equipment operationVSAvoidroad bearing capacity assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the assessment system into distinct functional modules: soil layer detection, pipeline detection, pavement structure assessment, and probability calculation. Each module can be operated independently, maintaining ease of operation, while the integrated framework ensures reliable comprehensive assessment by systematically combining results from all segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a single detection technique is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system structureVSAvoidparameter detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a data integration and processing system that acts as an intermediary between multiple detection techniques and the final assessment results. This intermediary component coordinates data from different detection methods, standardizes formats, and synthesizes information, thereby maintaining manageable system complexity while achieving high measurement precision through multi-source data fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides a comprehensive and accurate assessment of road collapse probability by integrating multiple factors, improving the scientific nature and accuracy of road collapse assessments, and enabling timely preventive measures.

Implementation Method 1

using FWD to obtain pavement condition information of the road to be analyzed, wherein the pavement condition information includes a deflection value of the road to be analyzed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeflection measurement:

Implementation Method 2

using GPR and/or EEM to obtain underground soil layer information of the road to be analyzed, wherein the underground soil layer information includes relative dielectric constant, electrical resistivity, and the underground structure condition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave reflection: Radar

Implementation Method 3

using GPR and/or EEM to obtain underground soil layer information of the road to be analyzed, wherein the underground soil layer information includes relative dielectric constant, electrical resistivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistivity detection: Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS12222462B2Method for evaluating probability of road collapse
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 RES INST OF HIGHWAY MINIST OF TRANSPORT
  • US12222462B2 patent drawing
  • US12222462B2 patent drawing
  • US12222462B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for evaluating a probability of road collapse is provided, which includes: collecting road data information of the road to be analyzed, and obtaining road soil layer information and underground pipeline information respectively through the road data information; determining road soil layer deterioration factors based on the road soil layer information; constructing a deterioration factor influence intensity model combined with the road soil layer information to obtain the probability of the influence of the road soil layer deterioration factors; constructing an underground pipeline deterioration influence intensity model combined with the underground pipeline information to obtain the probability of the underground pipeline deterioration influence; summarizing the probability of the influence of the road soil layer deterioration factors and the probability of the underground pipeline deterioration influence, and then evaluating the probability of road collapse, improving the scientific nature and accuracy of the road collapse assessment process.