Road Condition Detection Using Multi-Source Sensor Data Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to determine road conditions in real-time using data from multiple user mobile devices and vehicle sensors, leading to inadequate alerts for approaching drivers, which can result in accidents and inefficient maintenance of road infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects data from user mobile devices, vehicle sensors, and fixed sensors to identify dangerous road conditions, generates alerts for approaching vehicles, and creates work orders for maintenance by comparing sensor data across multiple devices to determine the presence of hazards like potholes, standing water, or weakened bridges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data is collected from multiple user mobile devices and vehicle sensors to determine road conditions, then measurement precision and reliability of road condition detection is improved, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad condition detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of road condition monitoring into segments: individual mobile devices and vehicle sensors independently collect local data, then a centralized server aggregates and analyzes data from multiple sources. This segmentation allows each component to remain relatively simple while achieving high overall measurement precision through data correlation across geographical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges data from multiple independent sources (mobile device sensors, vehicle sensors, fixed sensors) to determine road conditions. By combining data from multiple devices passing through the same geographical location, the system achieves high measurement precision and reliability without requiring any single device to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If real-time data collection and analysis from multiple devices is implemented, then timeliness of road condition alerts is improved, but use of energy and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert response timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection continuously as mobile devices and vehicles move through geographical locations. Data is cached and pre-processed locally, then quickly correlated and analyzed by the server when sufficient data is available. This preliminary action enables rapid alert generation without requiring intensive real-time computation at each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous intensive processing, the system uses periodic action by collecting data continuously but analyzing and generating alerts only when sufficient correlated data from multiple devices is available. This periodic analysis reduces energy consumption while maintaining timely alert delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If comprehensive sensor data is collected and analyzed, then reliability of road condition determination is improved, but quantity of data to be processed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad condition determination reliabilityVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant features from comprehensive sensor data for analysis. Instead of processing all raw sensor data in full detail, the system identifies and extracts key parameters that indicate road conditions, reducing the quantity of data to be processed while maintaining high reliability through focused analysis of critical information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects more data than strictly necessary (excessive action) from multiple sources, then processes only the portion needed for reliable determination (partial action). By gathering excessive data from multiple devices and sensors, the system ensures reliability through redundancy, then selectively processes only the correlated data necessary for accurate road condition assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9560490B2Method and system for determining road conditions based on driver data
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US9560490B2 patent drawing
  • US9560490B2 patent drawing
  • US9560490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining adverse/dangerous road conditions based on sensor data received from a vehicle and generating alerts for other vehicles which may encounter the same condition. The system receives sensor data from a vehicle and evaluates the data to determine if the vehicle encountered a potentially dangerous road condition. The system may apply one or more thresholds to the data, where the thresholds are designed to detect various sudden movements of the vehicle. The system may monitor the location associated with the potentially dangerous road condition and evaluate sensor data from one or more other vehicles that drive near the same location to determine whether they encounter a similar condition. The system may generate one or more alerts and transmit those alerts to vehicles that are approaching the location of the dangerous condition using location data provided by the approaching vehicles.