Road Hazard Detection Using LiDAR-Image Point Cloud Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing roadwork monitoring technologies rely on manual operators for hazardous object detection, leading to delays and reduced accuracy under adverse conditions, especially in low lighting or adverse weather, and struggle to identify small objects reliably.

Innovation Solution

A system combining a detection and ranging sensor, such as LiDAR, to generate a three-dimensional point cloud and an image capture device to provide visual data, with a processing module that identifies and maps hazardous objects, enhancing automation and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual operators are used to monitor and detect hazardous objects, then the system can identify objects with contextual understanding, but the response time is delayed and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical monitoring system with an automated sensor-based detection system. LiDAR sensors and cameras automatically capture data from the road environment, and processing modules automatically analyze this data to identify hazardous objects, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention while maintaining detection accuracy and significantly improving response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-detection and self-analysis of hazardous objects through automated processing modules that continuously monitor sensor data. The system serves itself by automatically generating alerts and notifications without requiring external human intervention, thereby improving productivity while maintaining reliable detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If cameras are used for detection, then visual data can be captured, but performance deteriorates in low lighting, adverse weather or over long ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual data qualityVSAvoiddetection reliability under adverse conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor types - specifically LiDAR sensors and cameras - to create a complementary detection system. LiDAR sensors provide reliable distance and spatial information that is unaffected by lighting conditions, while cameras provide visual context. By merging the data from both sensor types, the system overcomes the limitations of cameras alone in low lighting, adverse weather, or long-range scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a composite sensing approach, integrating data from different sensor modalities (optical cameras and electromagnetic LiDAR) to create a more robust detection capability. This composite sensing strategy ensures reliable operation across varying environmental conditions by leveraging the strengths of each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If conventional radar sensors are used, then detection can be performed, but accuracy is reduced in adverse weather and small objects cannot be reliably identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidobject identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional radar sensors with LiDAR technology, which uses laser light instead of radio waves. This substitution provides superior measurement precision for object identification, particularly for small objects, while maintaining productive detection capabilities. The LiDAR system's ability to resolve fine spatial details overcomes the limitations of conventional radar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from radio wave frequency (conventional radar) to laser light frequency (LiDAR). This parameter change enables much higher spatial resolution and improved ability to detect and identify small objects, while the rapid pulse repetition rates of modern LiDAR systems maintain high detection productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented, then response time is improved and productivity increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the automated detection system into distinct functional modules: data capture modules (sensors and cameras), data processing modules (for analyzing sensor data), and output modules (for generating alerts). This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture, making the complex automated system more manageable while maintaining high verification speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates faster and more accurate detection of hazardous objects, reducing human error and response times by automating the verification process and providing contextual information.

Implementation Method 1

detection and ranging sensors (hereinafter 'ranging sensors') typically transmit a series of signals which sweep across a field of view, the signals being reflected from the scene and their time of flight measured so as to measure distances to the reflection point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

the signals being reflected from the scene and their time of flight measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

distances to an object which are determined using passive visual data, e.g. triangulation using data from a camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4726677A1Hazardous object detection
Publication Date: 2026.04.15 ROADSIDE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • EP4726677A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4726677A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4726677A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system (100) for detecting the presence of a hazardous object on a road. The system includes a detection and ranging sensor (110), an image capture device (120) and a processing module (130). The detector and ranging sensor is used to capture data from the road and generate a three-dimensional point cloud based on the captured data. The image capture device captures visual data from the road. The processing module generates an identification of at least one hazardous object within the three-dimensional point cloud, where the identification includes a subset of points within the three-dimensional point cloud, and maps the subset of points in the three-dimensional point cloud to corresponding parts of the visual data.