Road Hazard Analysis Using Semi-Supervised Neural Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to efficiently identify and prioritize maintenance needs for roads and infrastructure due to challenges in detecting road hazards, faded lane markings, and overhanging trees and foliage, often requiring significant human annotation time and lacking accuracy in real-world scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A neural network-based analysis tool utilizing sensor data from vehicles to detect road hazards, faded lane markings, and overhanging trees, employing universal representation learning and semi-supervised training with pseudo-labels to reduce annotation time and enhance accuracy, enabling detection of road attributes and maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual annotation methods are used to identify road hazards, then detection accuracy can be achieved, but the annotation time increases from weeks to months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated annotation using trained neural network models to generate initial hazard detections before final verification. This preliminary action handles the bulk of annotation work, reducing the time required for manual verification while maintaining accuracy through subsequent review steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Trained neural network models serve as intermediaries between raw sensor data and final hazard identification. These models process sensor data to generate preliminary annotations, acting as a mediator that reduces the burden on human annotators while preserving detection accuracy through automated pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive sensor data collection is implemented to detect all road hazards, then detection coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of road hazard detection into multiple specialized neural network models, each trained to detect specific hazard types (potholes, cracks, faded markings, overhanging trees). This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage while managing complexity through modular, specialized components rather than a single monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network models are designed with universal representation learning capabilities, allowing them to process multiple types of sensor data (images, LiDAR points) and detect various hazard types using the same underlying architecture. This multi-functionality reduces system complexity by using unified models rather than separate specialized systems for each hazard type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12586355B2Road and infrastructure analysis tool
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 NEC CORP
  • US12586355B2 patent drawing
  • US12586355B2 patent drawing
  • US12586355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods is provided for road hazard analysis. The method includes obtaining sensor data of a road environment including a road and observable surroundings, and applying labels to the sensor data. The method further includes training a first neural network model to identify road hazards, training a second neural network model to identify faded lane markings, and training a third neural network model to identify overhanging trees and blocking foliage. The method further includes implementing the trained neural network models to detect road hazards in a real road setting.