Road Marking Trajectory Planning for Precise Vehicle-Mounted Application

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems for applying road markings face challenges in accurately localizing marking placement and are often too complex for practical use, leading to inefficiencies and safety risks for workers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a vehicle-mounted application tool with sensors and GPS to determine the vehicle's pose and compute a joint-space trajectory for precise marking application, incorporating sensor fusion to enhance localization accuracy and adapt to on-the-fly changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated systems are used to apply road markings, then productivity and safety are improved, but device complexity and localization accuracy worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking application efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the marking application process into distinct phases: path surveying with fiducial detection, real-time pose estimation using GPS and sensor fusion, and execution phase with automated tool control. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability and reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-contained application tools mounted on the vehicle that autonomously apply markings based on pre-computed trajectories and real-time pose feedback, eliminating the need for external guidance systems or complex human-machine coordination interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If sensor fusion and GPS are used to determine vehicle pose, then localization precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle pose accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary path surveying and fiducial detection before the actual marking application. During this survey phase, the optimal path and fiducial locations are pre-identified and stored, enabling simplified real-time pose estimation during execution without requiring complex real-time processing of all sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Fiducials serve as intermediary reference objects that simplify the localization problem. By detecting these known fiducial markers in the environment and comparing their observed positions with pre-stored survey data, the system can accurately determine vehicle pose without directly processing complex raw sensor data from multiple sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If hand painting with stencils is used, then adaptability to complex shapes is improved, but safety and productivity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking design flexibilityVSAvoidworker safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic trajectory computation that adapts to complex marking geometries by calculating appropriate application tool orientations and positions along the path. The joint-space trajectory computation allows the rigid application tool to dynamically adjust its pose to match complex marking shapes, achieving the adaptability previously requiring manual stencil work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If intermittent or sustained issues with localization accuracy occur, then marking precision worsens, but system simplicity is maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidmarking placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by repeatedly detecting fiducials during vehicle traversal and comparing observed fiducial positions with pre-stored survey data. This feedback loop enables real-time pose correction and compensation for drift or environmental changes, maintaining marking precision without requiring overly complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4280177B1Systems and methods to apply markings
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV
  • EP4280177B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4280177B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4280177B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An example method includes storing marking data to specify at least one selected marking to apply at a target location along a vehicle path of travel, the marking data including a machine-readable description and a marking reference coordinate frame for the selected marking. The method also includes generating task plan data to apply the selected marking based on the marking data and at least one parameter of an application tool. The method also includes determining a location and orientation of the application tool with respect to the vehicle path of travel based on location data representing a current location of a vehicle carrying the application tool. The method also includes computing a joint-space trajectory to enable the application tool to apply the selected marking at the target location based on the task plan data and the determined location of the application tool.