Road Surface Classification for Adaptive Vehicle Behavior Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies struggle to effectively adapt vehicle behavior to dynamically changing road surfaces and conditions, which impacts safety and drivability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that uses sensor measurements to identify and categorize road surfaces, determining drivability properties and making appropriate planning decisions to predict the behavior of other vehicles and adjust the vehicle's behavior accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vehicle uses standard driving behavior without adapting to road surface conditions, then the control system is simple and responsive, but safety and drivability deteriorate on hazardous surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of road surfaces using sensor data before the vehicle encounters hazardous conditions. By pre-identifying and categorizing road surfaces (ice, snow, rain, dry asphalt) in advance, the system prepares appropriate drivability properties and control parameters ahead of time, enabling safe adaptation without complex real-time decision-making during critical moments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives sensor measurements from the vehicle and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust drivability properties and control behavior. The feedback loop processes sensor data, updates surface classification, and modifies vehicle control parameters accordingly, creating an adaptive control system that responds to actual road conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle adapts to dynamically changing road surfaces in real-time, then safety and drivability improve, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to road conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the continuous road surface environment into discrete, manageable categories (ice, snow, rain, dry asphalt) with specific drivability properties. By dividing the complex continuum of road conditions into segmented classes, the system can apply targeted control strategies for each category without needing to handle every possible variation, reducing computational complexity while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic adaptation by continuously updating surface classification and adjusting drivability properties based on changing sensor measurements. The classification and control parameters are not static but evolve with changing road conditions, allowing the vehicle to adapt to dynamic environments through controlled, incremental adjustments rather than complex global optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the vehicle uses basic control without surface awareness, then the response time is fast, but the measurement precision of road conditions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad surface identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary surface classification using sensor data before critical driving decisions are required. By pre-processing and categorizing road surfaces in advance, the system reduces the time needed for accurate identification during actual driving scenarios, as the classification framework is already established and ready for rapid application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical or manual road assessment methods with sensor-based detection and computational classification. Using sensors to automatically measure and classify road surfaces substitutes for time-consuming manual evaluation, achieving high measurement precision through electronic detection while maintaining fast processing speeds through algorithmic efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12319271B2Road surface condition guided decision making and prediction
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US12319271B2 patent drawing
  • US12319271B2 patent drawing
  • US12319271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, techniques are described for receiving, from at least one sensor of a vehicle, sensor data associated with a surface along a path to be traveled by a vehicle; using a surface classifier to determine a classification of the surface based on the sensor data; determining, based on the classification of the surface, drivability properties of the surface; planning, based on the drivability properties of the surface, a behavior of the vehicle when driving near the surface or on the surface; and controlling the vehicle based on the planned behavior.