Crowdsourced Roadside Assistance Assignment System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing roadside assistance systems rely solely on proximity for assigning service providers, neglecting other critical factors such as user preferences, service provider skills, and insurance information, leading to inefficient and potentially unsafe service delivery.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that utilizes telematics information and service provider data to prioritize and assign roadside assistance service providers based on proximity, user preferences, service provider skills, and insurance information, incorporating sensors and a mobile application for real-time communication and payment processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If roadside assistance service providers are assigned solely based on proximity to distressed vehicle, then assignment speed is improved, but service quality and safety are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment speedVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the assignment parameters from a single factor (proximity) to multiple factors including proximity, service provider skills, user preferences, and insurance information. This multi-parameter approach resolves the contradiction by maintaining fast assignment through proximity while ensuring service quality through additional criteria evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds new dimensions to the assignment process by incorporating service provider skills, user preferences, and insurance information alongside proximity. This dimensional expansion allows the system to consider both speed (proximity) and quality (additional factors) simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between assignment speed and service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple factors are considered for service provider assignment, then service quality is improved, but system complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a multi-functional assignment mechanism that handles proximity calculation, skill matching, preference analysis, and insurance verification through a unified platform. This universal approach improves service quality through comprehensive factor consideration while managing system complexity by consolidating multiple functions into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic evaluation and weighting of multiple factors including proximity, skills, preferences, and insurance information without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability improves service quality through comprehensive analysis while reducing the perceived complexity for users by automating the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If traditional professional service providers are used, then service reliability is improved, but cost and scheduling difficulty are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidscheduling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables service providers to autonomously manage their availability, skills, and service offerings through the platform. This self-service approach maintains service reliability by allowing experienced providers to participate while dramatically improving scheduling ease through automated matching and real-time availability updates, eliminating the need for manual scheduling coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11132629B2Crowdsourced roadside assistance service provider assignment system
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11132629B2 patent drawing
  • US11132629B2 patent drawing
  • US11132629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure provide a computer-implemented method and system for the assignment of crowdsourced roadside assistance service providers to distressed vehicles/drivers requiring roadside assistance. The methods and systems may include a roadside assistance service provider system with a collection module, an assignment module, and a feedback module. The collection module collects roadside assistance service provider information and historical statistics from real-world information and stores the information in a database that may then be analyzed using particular rules and formulas. The assignment module assigns particular roadside assistance service providers to particular distressed vehicles/drivers based on one or more characteristics. The feedback module may provide near real-time cues to the roadside assistance service provider's mobile device, such as alerting when the amount of time spent on a task exceeds a predefined threshold, flagging high priority tasks/assignments, providing a technical reference for the repair.