Roadside Assistance Role Assignment for Non-Holders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional roadside assistance services do not adequately account for situations where a driver involved in a roadside incident is not the account holder of the roadside assistance account, leading to difficulties in providing services to associated individuals, such as teenagers driving their parents' vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A computerized roadside assistance system that assigns service provider roles and facilitates communication between individuals and service providers, allowing for service requests, status updates, and discount notifications, even if the individual is not the account holder, by modifying service provider role assignments and integrating with insurance company platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional roadside assistance services verify the driver is the account holder, then service authorization is ensured, but service cannot be provided to associated individuals who are not account holders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverage for associated individualsVSAvoidaccount verification process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the account holder role from the service requestor role. The account holder registers associated individuals separately, allowing service requests from non-account holders while maintaining account security. This segmentation enables versatile service coverage without compromising authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary verification mechanism where the account holder pre-registers associated individuals. This intermediary step bridges the gap between strict account holder verification and flexible service access for family members or authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system requires the driver to be the account holder, then decision-making authority is clear, but associated individuals cannot make service decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice request capability for driversVSAvoidauthorization decision-making
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The account holder performs preliminary action by pre-registering associated individuals and defining their service request permissions before incidents occur. This advance preparation enables associated individuals to make service decisions during incidents without compromising authorization reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts authorization based on the registered relationship between account holders and associated individuals. Different levels of service request authority can be assigned to different associated individuals, making the authorization system flexible and adaptable to various family or business relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If service providers are notified of all service requests, then service availability is maximized, but notification efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice response speedVSAvoidservice provider notification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by notifying different service providers based on the specific service type required. Instead of universal notification, the system identifies and notifies only the relevant service providers who can fulfill the specific service request, optimizing response speed without unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the notification parameter from universal to targeted based on service category. By analyzing the service request type and matching it with registered service providers' specialties, the system achieves efficient notification without requiring a complex universal notification infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11216824B1Role assignment for enhanced roadside assistance
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11216824B1 patent drawing
  • US11216824B1 patent drawing
  • US11216824B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An enhanced roadside assistance system may modify service provider role assignments in roadside assistance accounts. The system may be configured to modify a service provider role assignment associated with a roadside assistance account by assigning a service provider role to each of a plurality of service providers. The system may receive a service request from a roadside assistance device for an individual associated with a vehicle. The system may identify one or more of the service providers offering a type of service indicated by the service request. Based on the service provider role assignment, the system may transmit a notification of the service request to at least one of a plurality of computing devices associated with one of the service providers. The system may receive a response comprising one or more discounts and transmit the response to the roadside assistance device for presentation to the individual.