Roadside Vehicle Occupancy Imaging With Self-Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated vehicle occupancy detection systems face inaccuracies, latency issues, high implementation costs, and reliability challenges, especially under varying road conditions, making them difficult to move, install, or recalibrate.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle occupancy detection system using roadside imaging devices with light emitters and processors that capture images, determine regions of interest, and compute occupancy based on visible occupants, adjusting for vehicle speed and ambient conditions, with optional anonymization and augmented reality guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If automated vehicle occupancy detection systems are implemented, then detection speed is improved, but accuracy deteriorates under varying road conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidoccupancy detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors road conditions through multiple sensors (LIDAR, cameras, weather sensors) and adjusts detection algorithms in real-time based on feedback from environmental data, maintaining accuracy while preserving speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters such as threshold values, processing resolution, and sensor activation levels based on detected road conditions, allowing optimal balance between speed and accuracy for each specific operating scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If traditional automated occupancy systems are deployed, then detection capability is provided, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection capabilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection function into separate modular components (LIDAR for distance, cameras for visual confirmation, weather sensors for environmental data) that can be independently selected and combined based on budget requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multi-functional sensors that serve multiple purposes - for example, LIDAR provides both distance measurement and vehicle detection, while camera images serve both occupancy detection and road condition monitoring, reducing overall system cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If automated occupancy detection systems are installed, then occupancy data is obtained, but system reliability decreases under moving conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection functionVSAvoidsystem reliability when moved
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration and environmental adaptation before actual operation, creating a buffer that compensates for potential reliability issues during mobile deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system includes self-diagnostic and self-calibrating capabilities that automatically adjust to new environments without external intervention, maintaining reliability during installation and relocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If automated occupancy systems are deployed, then detection is provided, but calibration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection functionVSAvoidcalibration requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic self-calibration using onboard sensors and environmental references, eliminating the need for complex manual calibration procedures and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic parameter adjustment that automatically adapts to different installation locations and conditions, replacing fixed calibration requirements with flexible, data-driven parameter changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides accurate, reliable, and efficient vehicle occupancy detection, enabling faster installation and reduced calibration needs, while ensuring privacy through anonymization and providing real-time monitoring capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

a first roadside light emitter emitting light towards vehicles in the first field of view

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS20260112195A1Vehicle occupancy detection system
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 INVISION AI INC
  • US20260112195A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112195A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112195A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect there is provided systems and methods for anonymizing images and/or detecting countability scores. Anonymization can be carried out by extracting anonymized images from image processing techniques, anonymizing the image before image processing, or detecting regions of interest and anonymizing regions of interest. Countability scores can be detected based on the inexistence of people in the image. Countability scores can impact the confidence of the count of an image. Count confidence may be used to automatically enforce, for example, tolls.