Roadside Vehicle Occupancy Imaging with Infrared Weather Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated vehicle occupancy detection systems suffer from inaccuracies, latency, high costs, and difficulty in installation and calibration, especially under varying road conditions.

Innovation Solution

A roadside imaging system with a processor that captures multiple images of a vehicle's side from a fixed perspective, using infrared light to illuminate occupants and determine occupancy through machine learning, adaptable to different environments with minimal setup and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional automated vehicle occupancy systems are used, then occupancy detection is achieved, but accuracy deteriorates under varying road conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection accuracyVSAvoidperformance under varying road conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts image capture parameters including shutter speed, aperture, and exposure time based on detected road conditions such as rain, snow, or fog. The processor modifies these parameters in real-time to maintain optimal image quality and occupancy detection accuracy despite changing environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of the imaging device based on detected conditions. When adverse weather is detected, the system adjusts lighting parameters, capture frequency, and processing algorithms to compensate for reduced visibility and maintain high detection accuracy across diverse road conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If automated vehicle occupancy detection is implemented, then detection speed is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing images and pre-calculating detection thresholds before actual occupancy determination is needed. This allows the system to maintain fast detection speeds while minimizing latency by having processing algorithms ready and optimized in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results are immediately fed back to adjust subsequent capture operations. This real-time feedback loop allows the system to optimize detection timing and reduce latency by learning from previous detections and adjusting capture intervals accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If automated occupancy detection systems are deployed, then installation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection automationVSAvoidinstallation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated calibration and self-diagnostic functions. The processor automatically adjusts system parameters and performs quality control without requiring expensive manual calibration equipment or specialized installation personnel, thereby reducing overall installation costs while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical calibration procedures with electronic and software-based solutions. Instead of requiring physical adjustment mechanisms and manual alignment tools, the system uses digital processing and automated software to achieve precise occupancy detection, reducing installation complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Extent of automation

If traditional automated detection systems are used, then occupancy detection is achieved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements beforehand cushioning by incorporating redundant detection mechanisms and error correction algorithms that activate when anomalies are detected. This prepares the system in advance to handle potential failures or adverse conditions, maintaining reliable occupancy detection even when individual components encounter problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to continuously monitor detection confidence and system performance. When uncertainty is detected, the system requests additional information or adjusts detection parameters, creating a self-correcting loop that enhances reliability by compensating for potential errors in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high accuracy (above 95%) and robustness across various conditions, reducing costs and installation complexity while maintaining privacy and operating under adverse weather.

Implementation Method 1

A roadside imaging system with a processor that captures multiple images of a vehicle's side from a fixed perspective, using infrared light to illuminate occupants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS20250267189A1Road side vehicle occupancy detection system
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 INVISION AI INC
  • US20250267189A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267189A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267189A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting occupancy of a vehicle travelling in a direction of travel along a road. The system includes a roadside imaging device positioned on a roadside, and a first roadside light emitter, and a roadside vehicle detector. A processor is configured to receive a signal from the roadside vehicle detector, command the first roadside light emitter to emit light according to a first pattern for a first duration, command the roadside imaging device to capture images of the side of the vehicle, and compute a vehicle occupancy, in each of the captured images by determining one or more regions of interest in each of the captured images, and determining a number of visible occupants in the one or more regions of interest. The processor determines a most likely number of occupants based on each determined vehicle occupancy.