Robocall Filtering via Challenge Messages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for filtering out robocalls from incoming calls are not effective in distinguishing between robocalls and human calls, leading to the loss of important calls.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device and method that uses a three-step approach to identify and filter out robocalls by transmitting challenge messages to caller devices, determining caller identification, and controlling calls based on pre-stored call settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If blacklists or whitelists are used to filter robocalls, then robocalls can be identified and filtered out, but important human calls may be lost due to inaccurate distinction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobocall filteringVSAvoidcall distinction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification system between the blacklist/whitelist filtering and the final call delivery. This intermediary uses challenge messages (CAPTCHA, voice recognition, or SMS verification) to mediate the distinction between robocalls and human calls, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing filtering capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the response to challenge messages provides information about the caller's nature. The verification result feeds back into the call routing decision, allowing the system to adjust its filtering behavior based on the credibility evidence obtained from the challenge response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple challenge messages are transmitted to verify callers, then robocall filtering accuracy improves, but call handling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaller verification accuracyVSAvoidcall handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple independent challenge stages rather than one complex verification system. Each challenge message represents a separate, simple verification step that can be independently implemented and managed, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high verification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes verification parameters (type of challenge, number of challenges, time intervals) based on the initial filtering results and caller behavior patterns. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain high accuracy while adapting complexity to the specific verification needs of each call

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If all incoming calls are verified and filtered, then robocall reception is prevented, but important calls may be blocked due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobocall reception preventionVSAvoidimportant call delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a cushioning mechanism in the form of challenge messages that do not immediately block calls but rather test the caller. This prior cushioning allows genuine callers to prove their humanity before being blocked, preventing false positives while still stopping robocalls effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potential harm of false positives into a benefit by using challenge messages that can distinguish between automated and human callers. The verification process itself becomes a tool that transforms the filtering mechanism from a source of errors into an accurate distinction method

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentEP4154509B1Control of incoming calls based on call settings
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 SONY GROUP CORP
  • EP4154509B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4154509B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4154509B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An electronic device and method for control of incoming calls based on stored a plurality of call settings is provided. The electronic device receives a first call from a first caller party device associated with a first caller party. The electronic device transmits a first challenge message to the first caller party device based on the received first call. The electronic device further transmits a second challenge message to the first caller party device based on a first call setting of the stored plurality of call settings. The electronic device determines a time of receipt of a second call, different from the first call, received from the first caller party device. The electronic device further controls the second call based on a threshold time period, the determined time of the receipt of the second call, and a second call setting of a stored plurality of call settings.