Multi-Sensor Anomaly Cause Detection for Adaptive Robot Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial robots struggle to flexibly respond to product changes, leading to increased production of defective products and requiring manual adjustments, as they cannot accurately detect and analyze anomalies in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A determination device that uses sensor data from multiple sensors to identify anomalies by converting data into structural graph form and generating classifiers to determine the cause of anomalies, allowing for autonomous decision-making and immediate action by the robot.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If industrial robots are introduced to automate production, then productivity and labor efficiency are improved, but the robots cannot flexibly respond to product changes and generate defective products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidresponse to product changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensor data from the robot's operations is continuously collected and analyzed by a determination device. The system detects anomalies in real-time, identifies their causes, and provides feedback to adjust robot operations, enabling flexible adaptation to product changes while maintaining automated productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The determination device enables the robot system to autonomously detect and analyze anomalies without continuous human intervention. By automatically generating cause identification results and adjusting operations, the system serves itself, reducing the need for manual adjustments while maintaining adaptability to product variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If workers manually adjust robots to respond to product changes, then adaptability is improved, but productivity decreases due to continuous manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to product changesVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination device enables autonomous anomaly detection and cause identification, allowing the robot system to self-adjust to product changes without continuous worker intervention. This maintains high adaptability while preserving productivity by eliminating manual adjustment cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated determination device that uses sensor data analysis and machine learning algorithms to identify anomaly causes and guide robot adjustments, substituting human labor with intelligent automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to detect anomalies, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination device extracts and focuses on the most relevant sensor data related to specific anomaly causes. By selectively processing only the critical information from multiple sensors rather than all sensor data, the system maintains high detection precision while reducing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the anomaly detection process into distinct stages: data collection from multiple sensors, anomaly detection based on threshold values, and cause identification using structural data. This segmentation allows each component to focus on specific tasks, maintaining precision while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If anomaly detection and analysis are performed rapidly, then productivity is improved by preventing defective products, but measurement precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefective product reductionVSAvoidanomaly identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The determination device performs preliminary anomaly detection using threshold values from sensor data before full cause analysis is completed. This allows rapid identification of potential issues to prevent defective products, while more detailed precision analysis follows for confirmed anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms sensor data into structural data with graph structures that represent causal relationships. This dimensional transformation enables parallel processing of multiple anomaly indicators, achieving both rapid detection and precise cause identification simultaneously by analyzing data from multiple dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11487280B2Determination device and determination method
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 FUJITSU LTD
  • US11487280B2 patent drawing
  • US11487280B2 patent drawing
  • US11487280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A determination device includes: a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory and configured to: obtain sensor data on motion of a device from a plurality of sensors, extract, from the sensor data, data related to an anomaly based on a threshold value used in detecting the anomaly with use of the sensor data, convert the data related to the anomaly into structural data having a graph structure focusing on an analogous relationship between or among the plurality of sensors, and generate a classifier that identifies a cause of the anomaly with use of the structural data.