Robot Arm Oscillation Control via Intermediate Angular Velocity Sensor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots with multiple joints face challenges in suppressing oscillation at the distal end of their arms due to complex control requirements and accumulated errors, especially when the rotation axes of joints change, leading to amplified oscillation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a first and second angular velocity sensor in the robot's arm members, with a control unit that feedback-controls the joints based on the sensors' outputs to detect and manage movements, thereby reducing oscillation and error accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the technique of mounting an inertial sensor on the distal end side of an arm is applied to suppress oscillation, then oscillation can be suppressed in robots with fixed rotation axes, but oscillation cannot be sufficiently suppressed in robots where joint rotation axes change direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm oscillation suppressionVSAvoidapplicability to robots with changing rotation axes
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mounting position parameter of the angular velocity sensor from the distal end to an intermediate position on the arm. This parameter change allows the sensor to detect oscillation while being less affected by the complex kinematic changes in robots with varying rotation axes, thereby maintaining oscillation suppression effectiveness across different robot configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate angular velocity sensor that acts as a mediator between the base and the distal end. This intermediate sensor detects oscillation at a position where the influence of changing rotation axes is reduced, providing more reliable feedback for control while still enabling effective oscillation suppression at the distal end

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If feedback control is applied to suppress distal end oscillation in robots with multiple joints having different rotation directions, then oscillation can be reduced, but control complexity increases and errors accumulate toward the distal end

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm oscillation suppressionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the oscillation detection function from the distal end and places it at an intermediate position. This extraction simplifies the control problem by detecting oscillation at a point less affected by the complex cumulative effects of multiple joints with different rotation directions, thereby reducing control complexity while maintaining oscillation suppression effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes complex multi-joint oscillation analysis with direct angular velocity measurement at an intermediate position. Instead of calculating and controlling oscillation through complex mechanical models of multiple joints with varying rotation axes, the system directly measures angular velocity at a strategic location, simplifying the control approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If angular velocity sensors are mounted on arm members to detect movement for feedback control, then oscillation can be suppressed, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm oscillation suppressionVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically placing the angular velocity sensor at a specific intermediate position on the arm rather than uniformly distributing sensors throughout the system. This localized placement provides sufficient oscillation detection capability with minimal sensor count, balancing oscillation suppression effectiveness with device simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses arm oscillation in robots with multiple joints, even when the rotation axes of joints change, by accurately controlling movements and reducing the impact of errors, thus improving work efficiency and stability.

Implementation Method 1

a first angular velocity sensor provided in the first arm member or the first joint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular velocity sensing: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS9999974B2Robot
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9999974B2 patent drawing
  • US9999974B2 patent drawing
  • US9999974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot includes a plurality of joints including a first joint and a second joint that rotates in a direction different from a rotation direction of the first joint, a plurality of arm members including a first arm member provided to be rotatable with respect to a base via the first joint, and a first angular velocity sensor provided in the first arm member or the first joint. A first inertial sensor is provided in the first arm member (or a portion that rotates together with the first arm member in the first joint). The plurality of joints are controlled on the basis of an output of the first inertial sensor.