Robot Arm Assembly Locking for Fixture-Free Subcomponent Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing systems require multiple part locating fixtures for different sizes and shapes of components, which is inefficient and lacks a method to apply external forces without traditional fixtures during assembly operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using robot arms with end-of-arm tools that grasp subcomponents, apply initial forces, lock them together, switch to force control to compensate for gravitational forces, and apply external loads to distort the components into a working position, allowing assembly without dedicated fixtures, using interlocking mechanisms and linear actuators for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional part locating fixtures with fixed pins and clamps are used, then components can be accurately located and held in place, but the system requires multiple fixtures for different part sizes and shapes, increasing device complexity and reducing adaptability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different part sizes and shapesVSAvoidnumber of fixtures required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arm with end-of-arm tool is designed to perform multiple functions: grasping components, applying forces, positioning parts, and maintaining them during assembly operations. This single multi-functional system replaces the need for multiple dedicated fixtures for different part types, directly resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static fixed pins and clamps to dynamic robot-controlled end-of-arm tools that can adapt their position, force application points, and gripping mechanisms based on the specific component being assembled. This dynamic capability enables a single system to handle various part sizes and shapes without requiring multiple fixed fixtures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If robot arms with force control are used to apply external loads and distort subcomponents, then precise positioning and predictable thermal deformation can be achieved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precision and thermal deformation controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical positioning fixtures with robot arms equipped with force control capabilities. The force control system allows the robot to apply precise external loads and monitor reactions, achieving predictable thermal deformation during welding without requiring complex mechanical positioning mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The force control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the forces applied to and reactions from the components being assembled. This feedback enables real-time adjustment of the robot arm's actions to maintain precise positioning and control thermal deformation, achieving high manufacturing precision through intelligent control rather than mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple fixtures are used for different assembly operations, then various part sizes and shapes can be accommodated, but the changeover time and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to handle various part sizes and shapesVSAvoidassembly line efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arm with programmable end-of-arm tools serves as a universal assembly system that can handle various part sizes and shapes through software configuration rather than physical fixture changes. This eliminates fixture changeover time and maintains high productivity while accommodating design variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system accommodates different part sizes and shapes by changing operational parameters (grasping forces, positioning coordinates, force application magnitudes) rather than physical fixtures. This parameter-based adaptability allows rapid reconfiguration for different components without stopping the assembly line for fixture changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11364623B2Component assembly system
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11364623B2 patent drawing
  • US11364623B2 patent drawing
  • US11364623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component assembly system comprises a first robot arm having a first end-of-arm tool mounted thereon and adapted to grasp a first subcomponent; a second robot arm having a second end of arm tool mounted thereon and adapted to grasp a second subcomponent. A system controller is adapted to control the first and second robot arms and first and second end-of-arm tools to position the first and second subcomponents relative to one another. A first interlocking mechanism is mounted onto the first end-of-arm tool and a second interlocking mechanism is mounted onto the second end-of-arm tool, wherein the first and second interlocking mechanisms engage one another and lock the first end-of-arm tool to the second end-of arm tool, thereby locking the first and second subcomponents into an initial position relative to one another.