Robot Arm Surface Input Mapping for Fast Contact Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for interacting with robot arms suffer from significant delays and low accuracy in detecting contact positions, limiting their application to single contact points, making them inefficient for intuitive operation, especially in complex interactions.

Innovation Solution

A method where predefined input points or areas on the robot arm's surface are marked, allowing operators to easily recognize and interact with specific command-generating areas, using two-dimensional images applied to the three-dimensional surface, enabling intuitive operation and expanding functional capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If tactile sensors and machine learning algorithms are used to detect contact forces and estimate contact positions, then the robot arm can interact with objects, but the system experiences significant delay due to algorithm execution time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction capabilityVSAvoidalgorithm execution delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores mapping relationships between contact forces and contact positions in a lookup table before operation. When a contact occurs, the system directly queries the pre-computed table rather than executing complex algorithms in real-time, thereby eliminating algorithm execution delay while maintaining interaction capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified virtual model (lookup table) that copies the essential mapping between contact forces and positions from the complex physical system. This virtual representation allows rapid query-based determination of contact positions without replicating the computational complexity of the original sensing and analysis algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning algorithms are used to estimate contact position, then the robot can detect contact forces, but the accuracy in estimating contact position on the surface is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact detection capabilityVSAvoidcontact position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex machine learning algorithms with a deterministic physics-based calculation approach. By using the known robot arm geometry and force sensor measurements, the system calculates contact position through geometric relationships and force moment analysis, providing higher precision and repeatability compared to probabilistic machine learning methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the problem from estimating contact position directly from sensor data to calculating it from known geometric parameters and force measurements. By changing the approach from data-driven estimation to physics-driven calculation using precise geometric parameters, the system achieves higher measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If operators interact with the robot arm by applying force at undesignated points, then the robot can receive input, but the operation lacks intuitiveness and requires understanding of complex force-position relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand input capabilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different command functions to different locations on the robot arm surface by marking specific regions. Each marked region corresponds to a predetermined command, allowing operators to intuitively select functions by touching specific locations rather than understanding complex force application requirements. This creates local functional differentiation that simplifies operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces marked regions on the robot arm surface as intermediaries between the operator and the control system. These markings serve as visual guides that mediate the interaction, translating the operator's intuitive touch actions into specific commands without requiring the operator to understand the underlying force sensing and calculation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4015162B1Method for optimising the function of a robot arm
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FÜR LUFT UND RAUMFAHRT E V
  • EP4015162B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4015162B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP4015162B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for optimizing the function of a robot arm, comprising the steps of: marking an input point or an input surface on the surface of the robot arm, when this point or surface is pressed by an operator, a force and/or torque is detected in at least one joint, and deriving the position of the contact point on the surface of the robot arm, so that a command is derived which is to be triggered by pressing this input point and/or the input surface.