Robot Arm Control for C-Axis Interference Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In robots with multiple rotatable arms, interference occurs between the robot arm and attached control devices during movement, particularly when the C arm rotates, leading to operational inefficiencies and potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

A robot control device that limits the rotation range of the C arm through a processor-executed command, allowing for different rotation ranges in operations including and excluding a first state, thereby preventing interference between the object and the robot.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the C arm is allowed to rotate freely, then the robot's operational flexibility and workspace are improved, but interference between the attached object and the robot arm occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidinterference between object and robot
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the rotation range limitation conditional rather than fixed. The control unit dynamically adjusts the C arm's rotation range based on the current operational state - allowing full rotation when safe and limiting rotation when interference risk exists. This resolves the contradiction by making the system adaptable to different operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of rotation range from a fixed value to a variable parameter controlled by the control unit. By monitoring operational conditions and adjusting the rotation range parameter accordingly, the system maintains flexibility when needed while preventing interference when risks are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the rotation range of the C arm is limited to prevent interference, then safety is improved, but operational efficiency may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors operational conditions and periodically adjusts the rotation range limits based on current state. This periodic assessment ensures safety constraints are applied only when necessary, maintaining operational efficiency during safe operations while ensuring safety when risks arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic adjustment of rotation limits based on real-time operational state allows the system to maintain high productivity during safe operations while automatically enforcing safety constraints when needed, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11130227B2Robot control device, robot, and robot system
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11130227B2 patent drawing
  • US11130227B2 patent drawing
  • US11130227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot control device that controls a robot including an A arm that is rotatable about an A rotation axis, a B arm that is provided so as to be rotatable around a B rotation axis with respect to the A arm and allowed to be brought into a first state overlapping with the A arm when viewed from an axial direction of the B rotation axis, a C arm that is provided so as to be rotatable around a C rotation axis which is an axial direction intersecting with an axial direction of the B rotation axis with respect to the B arm, the robot control device comprising: a processor, wherein the processor is configured to suppress interference between an object and the B arm by limiting a rotation range of the C arm in a case where the object is attached to the C arm.