Robot Beacon Status Detection for Proximate Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inefficient navigation and increased collision risk for robots in warehouse environments due to the presence of obstacles, equipment, and other mobile objects, which hampers the efficiency of order-fulfillment processes.

Innovation Solution

A proximate robot object detection and avoidance system utilizing proximity beacons that allow autonomous robots to detect the status and proximity of beacons, enabling them to switch to a proximity operation mode, which includes reduced speed, waiting, or navigation to a new location to mitigate collision risks and optimize navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robots navigate at normal speed in warehouse, then productivity is improved, but collision risk with equipment and obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation speedVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of obstacles and equipment using sensors before the robot reaches them. The controller receives sensor data in advance and calculates potential collision risks, allowing the robot to prepare for speed reduction or path adjustment before entering hazardous zones, thus maintaining productivity while preventing collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the environment using sensors and provides real-time feedback to the controller. The controller adjusts the robot's speed and path dynamically based on the current proximity to detected objects, creating a closed-loop control system that balances navigation speed with collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If robots perform frequent speed adjustments and path changes, then collision avoidance is improved, but navigation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidnavigation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic speed adjustment based on real-time proximity to obstacles. Rather than frequent abrupt changes, the robot smoothly modulates speed in response to detected objects, maintaining navigation efficiency while ensuring collision avoidance through adaptive motion control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies speed reduction only when and where necessary based on obstacle proximity, rather than uniformly reducing speed throughout the entire navigation path. This partial action approach maintains high speed in safe zones while applying caution only in hazardous areas, preserving overall navigation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If robots navigate through narrow aisles with restricted visibility, then order fulfillment efficiency is improved, but detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple sensing modalities (cameras, LIDAR, ultrasonic sensors, infrared sensors) to create a comprehensive detection system. By combining these different sensor types, the robot achieves accurate object detection and distance measurement even in narrow aisles with restricted visibility, maintaining both safety and navigation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11213950B2Proximate robot object detection and avoidance
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 LOCUS ROBOTICS CORP
  • US11213950B2 patent drawing
  • US11213950B2 patent drawing
  • US11213950B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for proximate robot object detection and avoidance are provided herein which include a receiver in electronic communication with an autonomous robot and configured to receive a broadcast message from a beacon, a processor, and a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the autonomous robot to detect, based on the received broadcast message, a proximity of the beacon to the autonomous robot, determine, from the received broadcast message, a beacon status, the beacon status indicating whether the beacon is stationary, approaching the autonomous robot, or withdrawing from the autonomous robot, identify, according to the detected proximity and the determined beacon status, a corresponding proximity operation, and control the autonomous robot to stop an ordinary operation and operate according to the identified proximity operation.