Robot Behavior Planning for Sound and Light Risk Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous movement robots face challenges in planning optimal paths that not only avoid physical obstacles but also minimize the impact of risks such as sound and light generated by the robot on its surroundings.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device with a planning unit that generates behavior plans for a drive unit based on influence targets in a predetermined area affected by risks propagating in space, using influence target maps, environmental light/sound maps, and transfer function maps to reduce the impact of risks like sound and light.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot performs movement and work operations, then the robot's functionality and productivity are improved, but sound and light risks are generated that negatively affect the surroundings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot operation capabilityVSAvoidsound and light risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The planning unit proactively identifies influence targets (people, pets, other robots) before the robot executes movements or operations. By predicting the spatial propagation of sound and light risks in advance, the system selects behaviors that prevent harmful effects before they occur, rather than reacting after damage is done. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining productivity while preemptively eliminating harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the potentially harmful sound and light emissions into beneficial information for path planning. By modeling the propagation characteristics of these risks and identifying influence targets, the planning unit uses this risk information to optimize behavior selection, choosing paths and operations that minimize negative impact while maintaining operational effectiveness. The harmful factors become the basis for intelligent decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If the robot avoids physical obstacles using traditional path search, then collision risk is reduced, but the robot cannot account for non-physical risks like sound and light propagation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidrisk type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The planning unit is designed to handle multiple types of risks simultaneously - both physical obstacles and non-physical risks like sound and light propagation. By integrating influence target identification, risk propagation prediction, and multi-criteria behavior selection, the system provides universal risk management across different risk types, resolving the contradiction between reliable collision avoidance and adaptability to various risk scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The risk assessment process is segmented into distinct functional components: influence target identification, risk propagation prediction, and behavior evaluation. This segmentation allows the system to independently process different risk types (physical and non-physical) and integrate them into a unified decision-making framework, enhancing both reliability for collision avoidance and adaptability to diverse risk scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the robot operates in environments with people and sensitive areas, then the robot's operational flexibility is improved, but the impact of generated risks on vulnerable targets increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidimpact on influence target
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the environment for influence targets (people, pets, other robots) and uses this feedback to adjust behavior selection in real-time. When sensitive targets are detected in the vicinity, the planning unit modifies path planning and operation timing to minimize risk exposure. This feedback mechanism enables the robot to operate flexibly in populated environments while protecting vulnerable targets from harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Before executing movements or operations in environments with people, the planning unit performs preliminary risk assessment by identifying influence targets and predicting risk propagation. This preliminary action allows the robot to pre-select safe behaviors or adjust operational parameters before entering sensitive areas, ensuring operational flexibility while preventing harm to vulnerable targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12265392B2Information processing device, information processing system, and behavior planning method
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US12265392B2 patent drawing
  • US12265392B2 patent drawing
  • US12265392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Influence of risks, such as sound and light generated by the host device, on surroundings is reduced. An information processing device (100) according to an embodiment includes a planning unit (105) configured to plan behavior executed by a drive unit (107) based on an influence target existing in a predetermined area and affected by a risk propagating in space.