Robot Debris Bin Flap for Pressure-Driven Evacuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cleaning robots face challenges in efficiently evacuating debris from their bins without causing damage or reducing air flow efficiency, and existing evacuation stations require manual manipulation and generate noise during operation.

Innovation Solution

A mobile robot with a debris bin featuring a semi-spherical support structure and a flap door mechanism that opens in response to air pressure, connected by a biasing mechanism, and an evacuation station with a control system using a MEMS pressure sensor to optimize evacuation time and air flow, including a removable conduit for easy cleaning and a ramp for improved debris transport.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a manual door opening mechanism is used in the debris bin, then the structure is simple, but user manipulation is required and operation convenience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation convenienceVSAvoiddoor mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door unit is designed to automatically open and close based on air pressure differences. During evacuation, negative pressure inside the bin automatically opens the door without user intervention. The door closes automatically when pressure equalizes, eliminating the need for manual operation while keeping the mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The door mechanism utilizes air pressure differential to actuate the door opening and closing. A pressure-sensitive flap or diaphragm converts the pressure difference between the interior and exterior of the bin into mechanical motion, enabling automatic door operation without motors or complex actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Reliability

If the debris bin is evacuated without a door unit, then the structure is simpler, but debris can escape during traversal and reliability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris containmentVSAvoiddoor unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door unit automatically responds to pressure changes during evacuation, opening when needed and closing when pressure equalizes. This self-actuating mechanism ensures debris containment during normal operation while allowing efficient evacuation when activated, maintaining reliability without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The door unit may incorporate flexible membranes or thin-walled structures that respond elastically to pressure differences. These flexible elements provide effective sealing when closed while requiring minimal force to open during evacuation, achieving reliable containment with simple construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Productivity

If evacuation is performed without optimizing air pressure, then the process is simpler, but evacuation efficiency and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates pressure sensors that continuously monitor the air pressure inside the debris bin during evacuation. This feedback information is used by the control system to adjust the vacuum pump operation, maintaining optimal pressure differential for efficient debris removal while avoiding excessive pressure that would increase power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The evacuation process dynamically adjusts operating parameters such as vacuum pump speed and duration based on real-time pressure measurements. The system transitions from constant high-power operation to variable parameter control, optimizing evacuation efficiency while reducing overall energy consumption through adaptive parameter modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the flap extends beyond the exterior surface when open, then the opening area is larger for better evacuation, but the flap can contact objects and cause damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation flow rateVSAvoidcontact damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of extending the flap radially outward in a straight line, the mechanism uses a curved or articulated path that moves the flap through a three-dimensional trajectory. This allows the flap to achieve a larger effective opening area while maintaining a compact profile that prevents contact with external objects during robot traversal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The flap mechanism incorporates curved surfaces and circular motion paths rather than linear extensions. The flap may rotate along a circular arc or follow a spherical trajectory, allowing it to sweep open a larger area while the curved path keeps it clear of potential contact with floor surfaces or obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures efficient debris evacuation without contact damage, improves air flow, reduces user manipulation, and minimizes noise and power consumption during the evacuation process.

Implementation Method 1

a flap configured to move, in response to air pressure at the exhaust port, between a closed position to cover the exhaust port and an open position to open a path between the chamber and the exhaust port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a motor that is responsive to commands from the control system to remove air from the canister and thereby generate negative air pressure in the canister to evacuate the debris bin by suctioning the debris from the debris bin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative air pressure: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

a pressure sensor to monitor the air pressure. The control system is programmed to control an amount of time to evacuate the debris bin based on the air pressure monitored by the pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir pressure monitoring:

Data Source

PatentUS10154768B2Evacuation station
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 IROBOT CORP
  • US10154768B2 patent drawing
  • US10154768B2 patent drawing
  • US10154768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile robot includes a body configured to traverse a surface and to receive debris from the surface, and a debris bin within the body. The debris bin includes a chamber to hold the debris received by the mobile robot, an exhaust port through which the debris exits the debris bin; and a door unit over the exhaust port. The door unit includes a flap configured to move, in response to air pressure at the exhaust port, between a closed position to cover the exhaust port and an open position to open a path between the chamber and the exhaust port. The door unit, including the flap in the open position and in the closed position, is within an exterior surface of the mobile robot.