Robot Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Clamper for Pipeline Joint Docking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Manual docking of pipeline joints in propellant filling and other industrial processes is hazardous, time-consuming, and inefficient, posing risks to operators and hindering automation.
Innovation Solution
A robot multi-degree-of-freedom clamper with a humanoid configuration, featuring pneumatic clamping jaws and biaxial cylinders, enables automatic docking of quick joints with high accuracy and reliability, reducing manual labor and enhancing safety.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual docking of pipeline joints is performed, then operators can directly control the connection process, but operator safety is compromised and work efficiency is reduced due to hazardous conditions and time-consuming operations
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the manual mechanical docking system with an automated robotic system. The robot clamper uses programmable motion control to perform docking operations that were previously done manually, eliminating operators from hazardous environments while maintaining precise control over the connection process through automated positioning and clamping mechanisms
Solution Approach 2:
The robot clamper is equipped with autonomous capabilities to perform the entire docking process without human intervention. The system can independently navigate to the pipeline joint, position the clamping jaws, apply clamping force, and complete the connection, thereby serving itself to execute tasks that were previously requiring continuous manual oversight
2Ease of operation
If manual docking operations are performed, then flexibility in handling different scenarios is maintained, but time is wasted due to manual operation delays and waiting periods
Solution Approach 1:
The robot clamper incorporates dynamic motion control that allows it to adapt its speed and positioning in real-time during the docking process. The system can accelerate during transit, decelerate during positioning, and adjust clamping force dynamically, enabling it to maintain operational flexibility while significantly reducing the total time required compared to manual operations
Solution Approach 2:
The automated system eliminates idle waiting periods by maintaining continuous useful action throughout the docking process. The robot can continuously move, position, and clamp without the interruptions, breaks, or coordination delays that occur in manual operations, thereby reducing total docking time while maintaining the ability to handle various scenarios
3Extent of automation
If a robot clamper with multiple degrees of freedom is designed, then automatic docking capability is achieved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The robot clamper is divided into modular functional segments: a base platform, a robotic manipulator arm with multiple joints, a clamping mechanism with adjustable jaws, and a control system. Each segment performs a specific function and can be independently designed, tested, and maintained, which manages overall system complexity while enabling sophisticated automatic docking capabilities through the coordination of these modular components
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The clamper achieves efficient and safe automatic docking of quick joints, reducing human error, improving operational efficiency, and enhancing the safety and reliability of the system.
Implementation Method 1
pneumatic clamping jaws and biaxial cylinders
Data Source
AI summary
A robot multi-degree-of-freedom clamper has a short stroke biaxial cylinder installed on the clamping jaw supporting frame and an output end connected with a pneumatic clamping jaw A. In addition, a clamping jaw finger A is connected with an output end of the pneumatic clamping jaw A. A long stroke biaxial cylinder is connected with a pneumatic clamping jaw B. A clamping jaw finger B is connected with the output end of the pneumatic clamping jaw B. A pneumatic clamping jaw C is positioned between the pneumatic clamping jaw A and the pneumatic clamping jaw B. A clamping jaw finger C is connected with the output end of the pneumatic clamping jaw C. The clamping jaw finger A and the pneumatic clamping jaw A are driven by the short stroke biaxial cylinder to move back and forth on the clamping jaw supporting frame.