Robot Control With Multistage Sensor Fusion for Cleaner Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for training autonomous robots face inefficiencies due to the redundancy and confusion in image data, which degrades the learning process when combined with other sensor data types like proprioception and haptics, necessitating effective fusion techniques for improved performance in tasks like robot manipulation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a sequence of encoding stages with fusion layers that combine features from multiple sensor data types, including trainable fusion layers and late fusion, using transformer-based architectures to enhance information flow and reduce computational costs through masking, allowing for efficient encoding and control of robot devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If image data is combined with other sensor data types for robot training, then the robot can access more environmental information, but the redundant and confusing information in images degrades the learning process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidlearning quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fusion process into multiple encoding stages, where each stage processes sensor data independently before combining features. This allows selective integration of information at appropriate processing depths, preventing early contamination by redundant image data while preserving useful environmental information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different encoding strategies are applied to different sensor data types based on their characteristics. Image data undergoes specific preprocessing and encoding tailored to visual information, while other sensor types use appropriate encoders. This localized processing optimizes the quality of each data type before fusion, reducing the negative impact of redundant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If fusion is performed at multiple encoding stages, then information flow among encoders is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation flowVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fusion architecture implements a nested structure where fusion layers are integrated within the sequence of encoding stages. Each fusion layer is embedded between encoding layers, creating a hierarchical nested arrangement that enables multi-stage fusion without requiring separate independent modules, thus managing complexity through structured integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-stage to multi-stage encoding with intermediate fusion layers, adding a temporal/dimensional aspect to the fusion process. This dimensional expansion allows information to be fused at multiple processing depths, improving information flow while the structured progression through stages provides organizational clarity that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Use of energy by moving object

If transformer-based architectures with masking are used, then computational costs are reduced, but the processing capability may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidprocessing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The masking mechanism extracts and removes redundant or irrelevant information from the sensor data before full processing occurs. By identifying and masking out unnecessary features early in the encoding process, the system reduces the computational burden on subsequent transformer layers while preserving the essential information needed for accurate processing and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240269835A1Device and method for controlling a robot device
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20240269835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a robot device. The method includes: receiving sensor data for a plurality of sensor data types, processing the sensor data of the plurality of sensor data types by an encoding and fusion model which includes a sequence of encoding stages which each includes an encoding layer for each of the sensor data types generating features for the sensor data of the sensor data type, a plurality of fusion layers which each combine features of the multiple sensor data types generated by a respective one of the encoding stages and generating an input for a respective subsequent encoding stage in the sequence of encoding stages and an output stage generating an output from an output of a last encoding stage of the sequence of encoding stages, selecting an action to be performed by the robot device, and controlling the robot device to perform the selected action.