Robot E-Stop Control Using Position Lag Deceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Emergency stop events in moving robotic assembly lines can cause abrupt disruption of synchronized motion between robots and products, leading to undesirable impact forces during the contact phase, potentially resulting in damage to both the product and the robot.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an assembly robot, a tracking sensor, and a controller that calculates a lag value of the robot's position relative to a carrier and selectively transmits a speed signal to decelerate the platform only when the calculated lag value exceeds a threshold, minimizing contact forces during an emergency stop event.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot stops immediately upon e-stop event during contact phase, then the robot stops quickly and safety is improved, but abrupt disruption of synchronized motion causes collision and impact forces between end effector and product

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidimpact force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting the e-stop event and calculating the position lag value before actually stopping the robot. The controller evaluates the lag value (comparing robot position to carrier position) and only then decides whether to initiate deceleration, preventing abrupt stopping when not necessary and maintaining safety while avoiding impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by transitioning from a static stop command to a dynamic, conditional stopping process. The robot's deceleration is not immediate but is modulated based on real-time position lag calculations, allowing the system to adapt the stopping behavior to the current synchronized motion state and minimize impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the robot maintains synchronized motion with the carrier during e-stop, then impact forces are minimized, but the robot cannot stop quickly enough for safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact forceVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the position lag value (difference between robot position and carrier position) and using this information to control the deceleration process. The controller adjusts the robot's stopping behavior based on real-time feedback from the position lag calculation, ensuring both safety and minimal impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by modifying the robot's speed parameter dynamically during the e-stop event. Instead of a fixed immediate stop, the controller changes the speed parameter based on the position lag value, creating a variable deceleration profile that balances safety requirements with impact force minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the robot decelerates at a calibrated rate based on position lag, then synchronized motion is maintained and impact forces are reduced, but the stopping time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact forceVSAvoidstopping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by implementing selective deceleration based on the position lag value. The robot does not always decelerate at the calibrated rate - only when the position lag exceeds a threshold. This partial application of deceleration reduces unnecessary stopping time while still preventing impact forces when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8738180B2Robot control during an e-stop event
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8738180B2 patent drawing
  • US8738180B2 patent drawing
  • US8738180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for a work cell having a carrier that moves a product along an assembly line includes an assembly robot, sensor, and controller. An arm of the robot moves on the platform adjacent to the carrier. The sensor measures a changing position of the carrier and encodes the changing position as a position signal. The controller receives the position signal and calculates a lag value of the robot with respect to the carrier using the position signal. The controller detects a requested e-stop of the carrier when the arm and product are in mutual contact, and selectively transmits a speed signal to the robot to cause a calibrated deceleration of the platform before executing the e-stop event. This occurs only when the calculated tracking position lag value is above a calibrated threshold. A method is also disclosed for using the above system in the work cell.