Robot Event Prioritization for Remote Intervention Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In services utilizing autonomous mobile robots, the need for multiple operators to intervene remotely leads to high personnel costs, and reducing the number of operators can negatively impact service management due to increased workload and potential errors.

Innovation Solution

An information output method that detects events occurring during autonomous robot movement, calculates the importance level of these events, and outputs control information to prevent occurrences that exceed a predetermined condition, allowing for efficient personnel allocation while maintaining proper service management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple operators are deployed to remotely intervene in autonomous robot operations, then service management quality is maintained, but personnel costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice management qualityVSAvoidpersonnel costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs self-diagnosis and automatically determines whether operator intervention is needed by comparing its state against learned normal operation patterns. This self-service capability reduces the burden on operators and allows fewer operators to manage more robots effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors robot operation data, compares it with learned normal patterns, and provides feedback to determine when intervention is necessary. This feedback mechanism enables automated decision-making about when human operators need to be involved, optimizing resource allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the number of operators is reduced to lower personnel costs, then operational efficiency improves, but service management quality deteriorates due to increased operator burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidservice management quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot autonomously monitors its own operation state and determines whether intervention is needed, reducing the monitoring burden on operators. This allows operators to focus only on exceptions rather than continuous monitoring, maintaining quality with fewer personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of operation data against learned normal patterns before requiring operator intervention. This preliminary action filters out routine matters, allowing operators to concentrate on only the cases that truly require their expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If autonomous mobility is implemented without remote control capability, then operational speed increases, but reliability decreases due to lack of human intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational speedVSAvoidoperation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs self-diagnosis and autonomous decision-making about when intervention is needed, maintaining high operational speed while ensuring reliability through automated safety checks and selective human intervention when anomalies are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces continuous human monitoring with automated machine learning-based anomaly detection systems. This substitution maintains reliability through continuous automated surveillance while preserving operational speed by eliminating the need for constant human oversight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240370036A1Information output method, information output device, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US20240370036A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370036A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370036A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information output method is an information output method in an information output device. The information output method includes: obtaining first information regarding a movement of a first mobile object operated by autonomous mobility and remote control; detecting, based on the first information, an event that occurs while the first mobile object is moving; obtaining second information regarding an operator who intervenes an operation of the first mobile object; calculating an importance level of the event based on at least one of the first information or the second information; and outputting control information for controlling a second mobile object to prevent occurrence of the event whose importance level calculated satisfies a predetermined condition.