Robot Feedback Modes for Communicating State and Intent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems lack effective methods to interact with humans and provide feedback on their environment and operational states, leading to potential safety concerns and inefficiencies in task execution.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system equipped with sensors and processors that determine a model of its environment, assess its state and intended operation, and selectively engages in visual, auditory, or movement-based feedback modes to convey safety information and task progress to humans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If robotic systems operate autonomously without feedback mechanisms, then automation efficiency is improved, but safety and human-robot interaction quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple feedback channels including visual indicators (LEDs, displays), auditory signals (speakers, buzzers), and haptic feedback (vibrations, forces) that continuously communicate the robot's internal state, planned actions, and environmental perceptions to humans. This feedback mechanism maintains autonomous operation while significantly improving safety and interaction quality by keeping humans informed about robot operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces feedback indicators as intermediary elements between the autonomous robotic system and humans. These indicators serve as mediators that translate complex robot states and intentions into human-understandable signals, enabling safe human-robot collaboration without requiring direct communication or reducing automation level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If robotic systems provide comprehensive feedback to humans, then safety and interaction quality are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the feedback system into distinct modular components: visual indicators (LEDs, displays), auditory indicators (speakers, buzzers), and haptic feedback mechanisms. Each component handles specific types of information, allowing the system to provide comprehensive feedback while maintaining manageable complexity through functional segmentation and independent component design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If robotic systems use multiple feedback modes, then communication effectiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feedback mode selection where the robotic system adapts its feedback channels based on the operational context, human presence, and task requirements. The system activates only the necessary feedback modes for each situation, providing effective communication while minimizing energy consumption by avoiding unnecessary activation of visual, auditory, or haptic indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11826897B2Robot to human feedback
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US11826897B2 patent drawing
  • US11826897B2 patent drawing
  • US11826897B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example implementations may relate to a robotic system configured to provide feedback. In particular, the robotic system may determine a model of an environment in which the robotic system is operating. Based on this model, the robotic system may then determine one or more of a state or intended operation of the robotic system. Then, based one or more of the state or the intended operation, the robotic system may select one of one or more of the following to represent one or more of the state or the intended operation: visual feedback, auditory feedback, and one or more movements. Based on the selection, the robotic system may then engage in one or more of the visual feedback, the auditory feedback, and the one or more movements.