Robot Fleet Emergency Response for Priority Warehouse Evacuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency management strategies in warehouses fail to prioritize the protection of valuable goods over less valuable ones and do not account for human safety and structural integrity during emergencies, often causing unnecessary property damage and risking human life.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system of mobile units equipped with sensors to assess health and value, guided by robots (ERRs) that prioritize evacuation based on an optimization formula, using fire-resistant and water-resistant curtains, and dynamic lighting to guide safe paths, while utilizing fire extinguishers and fire suppression techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If water sprinklers are used to suppress fires, then fire suppression is achieved, but property damage increases and human safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppressionVSAvoidproperty damage and safety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the warehouse into multiple zones with different priority levels based on goods value and hazard assessment. Mobile units are assigned to specific zones and can be evacuated independently, allowing targeted fire suppression rather than blanket water application that causes unnecessary property damage across the entire facility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of mobile unit health, goods value, and hazard levels before emergencies occur. Priority rankings are pre-calculated based on optimization formulas that consider multiple factors. When fire is detected, the system can immediately execute pre-planned evacuation and suppression strategies, reducing response time and avoiding unnecessary property damage from delayed or inappropriate water application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If all goods are treated with equal priority during evacuation, then evacuation simplicity is maintained, but valuable goods are not protected and resource allocation is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation simplicityVSAvoidgoods protection and resource allocation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns different priority levels to different mobile units based on the value of goods they carry and their current hazard exposure. High-value goods receive higher priority for evacuation and protection, while low-value goods receive lower priority. This localized differentiation of quality ensures valuable assets are protected without requiring complete evacuation of all goods, maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the priority parameter of mobile units based on real-time conditions such as goods value, hazard level, and mobile unit health. The optimization formula continuously adjusts priority rankings as parameters change, allowing the evacuation strategy to adapt to current conditions while maintaining simple execution through pre-calculated priority lists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If emergency responses are delayed or non-prioritized, then response complexity is reduced, but human safety and property loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse coordinationVSAvoidhuman safety and property protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates priority rankings for all mobile units using an optimization formula that considers goods value, hazard exposure, and mobile unit health before emergencies occur. When emergencies are detected, robots can immediately execute pre-planned evacuation routes and suppression strategies without complex real-time decision-making, maintaining simple coordination while ensuring high-value goods and hazardous materials are prioritized for protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors mobile unit health, hazard levels, and evacuation progress, providing feedback to update priority rankings in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain simple robot coordination while dynamically adjusting priorities based on changing conditions, ensuring human safety and property protection are optimized throughout the emergency response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250216859A1Emergency management using robot fleet
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 INTEL CORP
  • US20250216859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A server includes a memory on which a map is stored, wherein the map represents locations of a plurality of mobile units; and a processor, configured to generate an emergency response plan based on sensor data and the map, wherein the emergency response plan comprises actions to be taken by a plurality of robots within a vicinity of the mobile units; and instruct a transceiver to send a signal representing the emergency response plan.