Robot Fleet Task Learning With Digital Twins for Supply Chains

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing processes face inefficiencies, product inconsistencies, and unreliability, leading to increased costs and supply chain inefficiencies, while conventional machine vision systems struggle with capturing rich object information and dynamic environments, and robotics implementations fail to leverage emerging technologies for optimal robot fleet management.

Innovation Solution

A robot fleet management platform with a governance library, intelligence layer, and simulation systems that utilize digital twins and machine learning to optimize robot fleet configuration, task ordering, and workflow management, integrating with additive manufacturing and supply chain automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional machine vision systems are used to capture object information, then system simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision and information richness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject information capture precisionVSAvoidvision system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vision system is segmented into multiple specialized components: depth sensors for 3D mapping, optical sensors for color and texture, thermal sensors for temperature detection, and motion sensors for tracking. Each sensor type captures specific aspects of the environment, and their data is integrated to form a comprehensive object representation, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensor modalities (depth, optical, thermal, motion) are merged into a unified vision system that processes combined data streams. This integration allows the system to achieve high measurement precision by leveraging complementary information from different sensor types while managing complexity through centralized processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If traditional supply chain processes are used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but productivity and efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply chain efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supply chain system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor product location, condition, and status in real-time. This data feeds back to central management systems that automatically adjust logistics operations, inventory levels, and routing decisions, significantly improving productivity while the automated nature of feedback reduces the need for complex manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service capabilities where robots autonomously perform tasks such as picking, packing, and sorting without human intervention. Supply chain entities automatically generate and execute their own operational plans based on real-time data, improving productivity while reducing the complexity of human-managed coordination systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing processes are used, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but manufacturing precision and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidproduct consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating detailed digital twins and simulations of additive manufacturing processes before actual production. Virtual prototypes are tested and optimized in silico, allowing parameters to be pre-adjusted for optimal precision. This preliminary digital preparation ensures high manufacturing precision while maintaining the flexibility of additive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Physical trial-and-error manufacturing is replaced with virtual simulations and digital twins. The mechanical process of repeatedly prototyping and testing is substituted with computational modeling that predicts manufacturing outcomes, thereby achieving high precision without sacrificing the adaptability of additive manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If robot fleets are deployed without advanced management systems, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity and task execution efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot fleet efficiencyVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A universal management platform is deployed that can control diverse robot types through standardized interfaces and common task definitions. The system performs multiple functions including task allocation, coordination, monitoring, and optimization across the entire robot fleet. This multi-functional approach achieves high productivity while managing complexity through a single integrated system rather than separate control mechanisms for each robot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12561659B2Machine-learned robot fleet management for value chain networks
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019 LLC
  • US12561659B2 patent drawing
  • US12561659B2 patent drawing
  • US12561659B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a fleet resources data store that maintains a fleet resource inventory indicating fleet resources that can be assigned to perform tasks. For each fleet resource, the inventory indicates features of each fleet resource and a respective status. A set of task definitions is accessible to an intelligence layer to facilitate improving task definition based on feedback from task-specific outcomes. The system receives a job request for a robotic fleet to perform a job and determines a job definition data structure indicating a set of tasks to be performed for the job. The system applies an outcome of performing a task by a resource assigned to perform the task to a machine learning system of the intelligence layer that facilitates improving, based on the outcome, the set of task definitions. The system updates the set of task definitions based on a result of applying the machine learning system.