Industrial Robot Force Control Evaluation for Parameter Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inexperienced operators face challenges in accurately adjusting parameters for force control in industrial robots, leading to inefficient operations and potential errors in subsequent processes, which can hinder machine learning and result in inaccurate learning models.

Innovation Solution

A determination apparatus that uses an evaluation function to assess the quality of operations based on data acquired during force control, enabling stable and standardized parameter adjustments without relying on operator experience, comprising a data acquisition unit, evaluation function creation unit, determination data creation unit, preprocessing unit, and learning unit to generate a learning model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If parameter adjustment is performed manually by an inexperienced operator, then the operation can be executed, but the determination accuracy of parameter suitability deteriorates leading to errors in subsequent operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracy of parameter suitabilityVSAvoidoperator experience requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

An evaluation function acts as an intermediary between the operator and the force control parameters. This function automatically evaluates parameter suitability based on operation data, eliminating the need for operator judgment while maintaining ease of operation. The evaluation function processes operation data and provides objective feedback on parameter quality without requiring expert knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by evaluating operation data through the evaluation function and using the results to guide parameter adjustment. The feedback mechanism provides continuous information about parameter suitability, allowing operators to make informed adjustments without needing extensive experience. The feedback loop ensures that parameter decisions are based on objective evaluation rather than subjective judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If parameter adjustment is performed manually by trial and error, then the operation can be executed, but the time required for determination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation execution speedVSAvoidtime for parameter determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation function performs preliminary evaluation of parameter suitability before actual force control execution. By assessing parameter quality in advance using operation data, the system avoids time-consuming trial and error during actual operations. The preliminary evaluation guides parameter selection, ensuring that suitable parameters are chosen before execution begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual trial-and-error adjustment with an automated evaluation mechanism. Instead of relying on physical trial and error processes that consume time, the evaluation function automatically assesses parameter suitability based on operation data, significantly reducing the time required for parameter determination while maintaining operation execution speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If force control is implemented with manual parameter setting, then the control function is achieved, but the manufacturing precision of the operation deteriorates due to incorrect parameter determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation qualityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation function performs self-service by automatically evaluating parameter suitability without requiring external expert judgment. The function uses operation data to assess parameters and provides objective feedback on quality, enabling the system to self-correct and maintain high manufacturing precision. This self-evaluation mechanism eliminates the need for complex manual adjustment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation function serves as an intermediary between the force control system and parameter adjustment processes. It objectively evaluates parameter quality based on operation data, providing guidance that ensures high manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual intervention. The intermediary function bridges the gap between automated control and quality assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11654556B2Determination apparatus for determining an operation of an industrial robot
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 FANUC LTD
  • US11654556B2 patent drawing
  • US11654556B2 patent drawing
  • US11654556B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A determination apparatus acquires, as acquired data, the state of force and moment applied to a manipulator and the state of the position and the posture in an operation when a force control of an industrial robot is carried out, and creates an evaluation function that evaluates the quality of the operation of the industrial robot based on the acquired data. Then, it creates determination data for the acquired data using the evaluation function, and creates state data used for machine learning based on the acquired data. Then, it generates a learning model for determining a quality of an operation of the industrial robot using the state data and the determination data.