Robot Fork Collision Type Control for Obstacle Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots used in warehouses are prone to fork collisions with obstacles, leading to potential damage and increased maintenance costs due to continuous fork operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine the collision type of a robot's fork and implement specific processing strategies to protect the fork from damage by controlling movement speeds and rotations based on the collision type, including strategies for telescopic arms being stretched or not stretched, and incorporating sensors for accurate detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot continues to control the fork to perform actions when obstacles exist around, then the productivity is improved, but the fork is likely to be damaged which increases the device maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoods processing efficiencyVSAvoidfork durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary collision detection before the fork completes its action. Sensors detect obstacles in the fork's path and trigger a collision processing strategy before damage can occur, preventing harmful effects while allowing continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to continuously monitor the fork's environment and provides feedback to the control unit. When collision is detected, the control unit adjusts the fork's actions in real-time, allowing the system to adapt and protect the fork while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the robot equips collision detection sensors and implements collision processing strategies, then the fork protection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefork protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The collision detection system uses existing sensors (current sensors, speed sensors, pressure sensors) that serve multiple functions - monitoring fork operation, detecting collisions, and providing feedback for control adjustments. This multi-functionality reduces the need for dedicated collision detection hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own operational parameters (current, speed, pressure) to detect collisions without requiring external specialized sensors. The fork's own operating data serves the dual purpose of controlling operation and detecting collisions, simplifying the overall system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12459797B2Fork collision processing method and apparatus, robot, device, medium, and product
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 HAI ROBOTICS CO LTD
  • US12459797B2 patent drawing
  • US12459797B2 patent drawing
  • US12459797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application provides a fork collision processing method and apparatus, a robot, a device, a medium, and a product. The method includes: determining a collision type when it is detected that a fork of a robot encounters a collision; determining a fork collision processing strategy according to the collision type; and processing the fork collision according to the fork collision processing strategy. In this application, when it is detected that the fork of the robot encounters a collision, the collision type of the fork collision is first determined, then the fork collision processing strategy is determined according to the determined collision type, and finally the fork collision event is processed according to the determined fork collision processing strategy.