Robot Grasp Quality Detection for Damaged Warehouse Objects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile robots in warehouse environments struggle with efficiently handling objects of varying quality, leading to inefficiencies and potential downtime due to improper handling of damaged items, which can breach their integrity and disrupt operations.

Innovation Solution

A mobile robot system that utilizes a trained machine learning model to assess the quality of objects, determining a quality metric through image processing, and adjusts its grasping strategies and operational parameters based on this metric to handle objects effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mobile robots handle objects without quality assessment, then operational speed is maintained, but object integrity is compromised due to improper handling of damaged items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject integrityVSAvoidoperational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs quality assessment of objects before the robot attempts to grasp them. The machine learning model analyzes images of objects on conveyor belts or in storage areas, identifying damaged items in advance. This preliminary action allows the robot to plan appropriate handling strategies or avoid damaged objects entirely, preventing integrity breaches during manipulation while maintaining operational flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where quality assessment results directly influence robot grasping decisions. The machine learning model continuously evaluates object quality, and this information feeds back to the robot controller, which adjusts grasping force, grip position, and manipulation speed accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures objects are handled appropriately based on their actual condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If mobile robots use quality assessment to adjust grasping strategies, then object handling effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases due to machine learning integration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary quality assessment module that sits between the robot's perception system and its manipulation controller. This intermediate layer processes object images through machine learning models to generate quality metrics, which then guide the grasping strategy selection. This intermediary architecture decouples the complexity of quality assessment from the control system, allowing each component to remain relatively simple while the integrated system achieves high handling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is trained on historical data from the specific warehouse environment, allowing it to automatically adapt to the particular types of objects, packaging materials, and damage patterns encountered. The system serves itself by continuously learning from operational data, reducing the need for manual configuration and expert intervention, thereby managing complexity through autonomous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If mobile robots process images using machine learning models, then quality detection accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The quality assessment process is segmented into multiple stages: initial rapid filtering using simple image features, followed by more detailed analysis only for objects that require closer inspection. The machine learning model processes images in a hierarchical manner, first identifying obvious damage patterns quickly, then applying more computationally intensive analysis only when necessary. This segmentation reduces average processing time while maintaining high detection accuracy for damaged objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary quality screening using lightweight image processing techniques before applying full machine learning analysis. Simple features such as color variations, edge detections, and basic shape analysis are computed first to identify potential damage cases. Only objects flagged by this preliminary analysis undergo comprehensive machine learning evaluation, reducing the number of full-processing cases and overall processing time while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250370476A1Methods and apparatus for object quality detection
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 BOSTON DYNAMICS INC
  • US20250370476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for assigning a quality metric to an object to be grasped by a mobile robot are provided. The method includes receiving at least one image including a set of objects, processing the at least one image using a trained machine learning model to assign a quality metric to a first object of the set of objects in the at least one image, and controlling the mobile robot to perform an action based, at least in part, on the quality metric assigned to the first object.