Robot Object Grasping with Confidence-Based Action Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Service robots face challenges in executing tasks when encountering untrained instructions or objects with similar attributes, leading to low success rates and efficiency in task execution.

Innovation Solution

An object grasping method that determines the confidence of candidate objects being the target object based on state description information and preset states, and performs preset actions such as grasping and questioning to determine the optimal action for object grasping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot executes pre-trained tasks only, then the task execution reliability is improved for known tasks, but the adaptability deteriorates when untrained tasks or instructions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to untrained tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic task execution framework that transitions between pre-trained task execution and active learning modes. The system dynamically adjusts its operation based on whether the current task is recognized as pre-trained or novel, enabling both high reliability for known tasks and adaptability for untrained tasks through real-time mode switching

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs self-learning by actively asking questions when encountering untrained tasks. The system uses its own curiosity-driven questioning mechanism to gather information about novel tasks, enabling it to independently expand its capability without external intervention, thus improving adaptability while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the robot identifies objects one by one in scenarios with similar attributes, then the measurement precision is improved for individual object identification, but the productivity deteriorates due to increased identification time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification precisionVSAvoidtask execution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object identification process into two stages: first, group objects with similar attributes using clustering algorithms to reduce the search space; second, apply precise identification methods only within each cluster. This segmentation maintains high identification precision while significantly improving efficiency by avoiding sequential comparison of all objects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial identification actions by first performing attribute-based grouping rather than complete individual identification for all objects. This partial action approach identifies objects efficiently in groups, reserving detailed individual identification only when necessary, thus balancing precision and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the robot asks more questions to clarify user instructions, then the task execution accuracy is improved, but the loss of time increases due to extended conversation duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction understanding accuracyVSAvoidconversation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of user instructions using pre-trained language models to predict the most likely intended tasks before engaging in conversation. This preliminary action allows the system to proactively ask targeted clarification questions rather than engaging in extended back-and-forth dialogue, reducing conversation time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where each question asked is based on previous interaction outcomes and confidence level assessments. The robot continuously updates its understanding based on user responses and adjusts subsequent questions accordingly, minimizing unnecessary conversations and reducing time loss while maintaining high instruction understanding accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4550259A1Object scraping method and apparatus, computer device, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 BEIJING YOUZHUJU NETWORK TECH CO LTD
  • EP4550259A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4550259A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4550259A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an object grasping method, an apparatus, a computer device and a storage medium, the method includes: in response to receiving a target object grasping instruction, determining a second confidence of each of candidate objects being a target object based on state description information of the target object and a first confidence of each of the candidate objects in a current scene having each preset state; determining a target candidate object and a reward information after performing each preset action for the target candidate object based on the first confidence and the second confidence; and determining a target preset action to be performed based on the reward information, and performing the target preset action. In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the robot does not need to be pre-trained, and the target candidate object that meets the requirements of the user can be determined more accurately; and by determining the optimal target preset action, the number of conversations with the user is reduced, the target object can be grasped as soon as possible, and the success rate and efficiency of task execution are improved.