Robot-Guided Destacking Mechanism for Precise Object Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional separating mechanisms in automatic stamping production lines have limited degrees of freedom and flexibility, leading to low separating efficiency and affecting the normal operation of the production line.

Innovation Solution

A robot-driven separating mechanism that moves to appropriate positions, controlled by a controller to adjust height and distance, using sensors to determine optimal separation points, and employing methods such as air flow, magnetic force, or saw tooth strips to separate objects in a stack.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional separating mechanism mounted on a linear guide is used, then the structure is simple, but the degrees of freedom are limited and flexibility is low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical linear guide system with a robot arm system. The robot arm uses its multi-axis joints and end effector to achieve separating movements, substituting complex mechanical guides with a more flexible robotic system that provides multiple degrees of freedom through its articulated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic positioning capability by using a robot arm that can adjust its position and orientation in real-time. The robot arm can dynamically adapt to different stack positions and object configurations, providing flexibility through controlled movement in multiple directions rather than being constrained to a fixed linear path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If a conventional separating mechanism is used, then the mechanism is simpler, but the positioning accuracy is lower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates sensors (such as optical sensors or proximity sensors) that provide feedback on the position of the separating mechanism relative to the object stack. This feedback enables the robot control system to adjust the position and movement of the separating mechanism to achieve precise positioning, ensuring accurate separation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical positioning systems with a robot arm system controlled by digital signals and sensor feedback. This substitution enables higher positioning accuracy through programmable motion control and real-time adjustment, replacing less accurate mechanical guides and fixed positioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If a conventional separating mechanism is used, then the structure is less complex, but the separating efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparating efficiencyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a robot arm that can dynamically adjust its speed, position, and movement trajectory to optimize the separating process. The robot arm can accelerate and decelerate smoothly, position itself precisely for each separation action, and adapt its movement pattern to the stack configuration, thereby improving separating efficiency through dynamic control rather than fixed mechanical operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the separating mechanism by using a robot arm that can vary its speed, position, and force application dynamically. This allows optimization of the separating process for different object types and stack configurations, improving efficiency through parameter adjustment rather than being constrained by fixed mechanical parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides higher flexibility, positioning accuracy, and reliability, improving separating efficiency and simplifying the destacking process with fewer failure points and increased standardization.

Implementation Method 1

The separating mechanism is configured to separate the objects by at least one of an air flow, a magnetic force, and a saw tooth strip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 2

The separating mechanism is configured to separate the objects by at least one of an air flow, a magnetic force, and a saw tooth strip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12077396B2Apparatus and method for separating objects
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US12077396B2 patent drawing
  • US12077396B2 patent drawing
  • US12077396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of present disclosure relate to an apparatus and a method for separating objects. The apparatus comprises: a separating mechanism configured to separate objects arranged in a stack; a robot configured to hold the separating mechanism; and a controller configured to: cause the robot to move the separating mechanism to a first height; cause the robot to move the separating mechanism towards the stack; in response to a distance between the separating mechanism and the stack reaching a distance threshold, cause the robot to stop moving the separating mechanism; and cause the separating mechanism to separate the objects.