Robot-Guided Wall Construction Using Detectable Marking Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional concrete constructions are costly, require skilled personnel, have limited application scenarios due to robot size and noise, and result in high CO2 emissions, with components difficult to reuse or recycle.

Innovation Solution

A construction system comprising a robot device and a marking device that allows end-users to construct walls and pillars with reduced complexity and flexibility, using a robot that can detect and follow a marking device laid out by the user, enabling automation and ease of use without specialized knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional concrete constructions are used, then structural strength and stability are achieved, but construction costs increase and environmental impact worsens due to high CO2 emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidCO2 emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameters by replacing concrete with a mixture of stone fractions (5-50mm), binding agents (5-15% by weight), and water (65-80% by weight). This parameter change maintains structural strength while eliminating the high CO2 emissions associated with concrete production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining stone fractions of different sizes (5mm, 10mm, 20mm, 50mm) with binding agents to create a new construction material that replaces concrete. This composite approach achieves structural integrity without the environmental harm of conventional concrete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If concrete constructions are built, then foundation stability is achieved, but construction complexity and costs increase due to specialized foundation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation stabilityVSAvoidfoundation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the weight and density parameters of the construction material by using stone fractions with binding agents instead of heavy concrete. This allows the structure to be built on normal soil ground without requiring solid foundations, reducing foundation complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If robots are used to construct jammed architectural structures, then construction automation is achieved, but device size and noise level increase limiting application scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction automationVSAvoidrobot size
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the construction process into simple, repetitive tasks that can be performed by smaller, less complex robotic units. The modular nature of placing individual stone fractions allows automation without requiring large, noisy construction robots, enabling use in residential and confined spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If concrete constructions are built, then structural integrity is achieved, but reusability and recyclability worsen as components cannot be directly reused

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidreusability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables recovery and reuse of stone fractions after disassembly. Unlike concrete that must be recycled, the stone fractions can be cleaned of binding agent residues and reused in new constructions, maintaining structural integrity while improving reusability and reducing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

5Manufacturing precision

If marking device with sensor wire is used, then construction precision and flexibility are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction precisionVSAvoidmarking device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement and positioning systems with a simple sensor wire that emits detectable signals. The robotic system uses optical or electromagnetic sensors to detect the wire's position, substituting mechanical complexity with field-based detection while maintaining high construction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system facilitates construction of flexible, low-complexity architectural structures using solid material pieces, allowing for easy disassembly and reuse, reducing the need for skilled labor and environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

The marking device is detectable by the robot device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12377545B2Construction system
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 BRETT TOBIAS
  • US12377545B2 patent drawing
  • US12377545B2 patent drawing
  • US12377545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Construction system, particularly for operation by an end-user, comprising a robot device configured for constructing a wall and/or pillar structure, and at least one marking device for defining the course, form and/or position of a wall and/or pillar structure, wherein the marking device is detectable by the robot device, and wherein the robot device is configured to construct a wall and/or pillar structure at and/or along the marking device.