Encoder-Based Robot Hand Gripping Force Control Without Pressure Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robot hands face difficulties in gripping a variety of workpieces with appropriate force without damaging them, as they require manual adjustment of gripping force based on the workpiece's material, and the addition of pressure sensors increases manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A robot hand with a motor-driven claw system, an encoder for rotational position detection, and a control device that limits torque, estimates contact through rotational position change, gradually increases torque, and maintains it based on movement limits to ensure appropriate gripping force without damaging workpieces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the gripping force is increased to firmly grip hard workpieces, then the gripping reliability is improved, but soft workpieces may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping reliabilityVSAvoidworkpiece damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The robot hand dynamically adjusts the gripping force in two stages: initially applying a limited torque to avoid damage, then increasing to a higher torque when contact is detected. This dynamic adjustment allows the same robot hand to safely grip both soft and hard workpieces without damage or slippage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the torque parameter from a fixed value to a variable that can take two distinct values: a torque limit value for initial contact and a higher torque upper limit value for firm gripping. This parameter change enables adaptive gripping force adjustment based on workpiece hardness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a pressure sensor is added to detect gripping force and adjust automatically, then the adaptability to various workpieces is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to various workpiecesVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the pressure sensor-based detection system with a motor torque control system. Instead of using additional sensors to detect gripping force, the system uses the motor's existing torque control capability combined with encoder feedback to achieve the same adaptability, thereby avoiding increased manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot hand uses its own motor and encoder system to detect contact and adjust gripping force, rather than relying on external pressure sensors. The motor's torque characteristics and the encoder's position feedback work together to provide self-service detection and adjustment functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the gripping force is set to be weak to avoid damaging soft workpieces, then workpiece damage is prevented, but the workpiece may fall during gripping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece damage preventionVSAvoidgripping stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions from a weak gripping force (torque limit value) to a strong gripping force (torque upper limit value) upon detecting workpiece contact. This ensures that soft workpieces are initially gripped gently to prevent damage, then firmly held to prevent falling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of gripping force is required for each workpiece type, then appropriate gripping force can be applied, but the operation complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping force accuracyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robot hand automatically detects workpiece contact through the motor's rotational position feedback and self-adjusts the gripping force without manual intervention. The system autonomously transitions from torque limit to torque upper limit based on contact detection, eliminating the need for operators to manually adjust settings for different workpiece types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The encoder provides feedback on the motor's rotational position, enabling the control device to detect when the claws have contacted the workpiece. This feedback mechanism allows automatic adjustment of gripping force without manual intervention, maintaining accuracy while reducing operation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12257710B2Robot hand and method for controlling robot hand
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 SHINANO KENSHI CO LTD
  • US12257710B2 patent drawing
  • US12257710B2 patent drawing
  • US12257710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot hand includes a motor, claws configured to grip a workpiece in accordance with rotation of the motor, an encoder configured to detect a rotational position of the motor, and a control device configured to control a torque of the motor such that the claws grip the workpiece in accordance with the rotational position.