Autonomous Mobile Robot Haptic Guidance With Force-Vector Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous and semi-autonomous robots lack effective mechanisms for human interaction and control, particularly in environments where human workers need to operate them without specific devices, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

Integration of haptic feedback into the mechanical drive unit of autonomous mobile robots, allowing for intuitive user control through force sensors and omnidirectional movement, with features like virtual rail alignment and obstacle avoidance, and the ability to switch between autonomous and user-guided modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If graphical user interface control is used for autonomous robots, then user control capability is provided, but user accessibility and ease of operation are reduced for workers without specific devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control accessibilityVSAvoidcontrol interface requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional graphical user interface control with direct mechanical force sensing through a handlebar. Workers can control the robot by physically pushing or pulling the handlebar, eliminating the need for screens, buttons, or complex interfaces. This mechanical substitution makes the control system accessible to any worker without specialized training or equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot autonomously interprets and executes commands based on physical forces applied to the handlebar. The force sensor detects the direction and magnitude of pushes or pulls, and the robot's control system automatically translates these inputs into appropriate navigation actions, eliminating the need for manual interface operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If haptic feedback is added to the mechanical drive unit, then user control precision and feedback are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce sensing accuracyVSAvoidmechanical drive unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the haptic feedback mechanism with the existing mechanical drive unit. The force sensors that detect user input are integrated into the same mechanical structure that provides propulsion and movement. This merging allows the drive unit to serve dual purposes: generating motion and providing haptic feedback, thereby reducing overall system complexity rather than increasing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical drive unit is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides omnidirectional movement capability and simultaneously serves as the haptic feedback interface. The force sensors integrated into the drive unit detect both the user's control inputs and provide tactile resistance, making the system more efficient and less complex than separate control and feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If force sensors are integrated into the handlebar, then user input detection capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input detectionVSAvoidhandlebar assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs force sensors that detect changes in physical parameters (force magnitude and direction) applied to the handlebar. By focusing on measuring fundamental mechanical parameters rather than complex inputs, the system achieves versatile user input detection while maintaining manufacturing simplicity. The sensors measure basic force vectors that can be processed to determine various user intentions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250278094A1Systems and Methods for an Autonomous Mobile Robot Haptic Feedback
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 ROBUST AI INC
  • US20250278094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278094A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An omnidirectional mechanical drive unit in a robot may be controlled by a processor. An input message characterizing a physical force exerted on a force sensor in a first direction may be received. A physical force input vector quantifying the physical force in two or more dimensions may be determined based on the input message. Upon determining that a triggering condition for navigational feedback is satisfied, a haptic force input vector for provide haptic navigational feedback via the omnidirectional mechanical drive unit may be determined. A force output vector aggregating the physical force input vector and the haptic force input vector may be determined. The force output vector may quantify a force to apply to move the robot in a second direction. An indication of the force output vector may be transmitted to the omnidirectional mechanical drive unit. The robot may be moved based on the force output vector.